Analysis of the Reasons for the Formation of Network Group Polarization and its Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/kcvbhw90Keywords:
Internet, Net group polarizationAbstract
With the development of the Internet, the phenomenon of network group polarization has become more and more serious. This paper looks at how network group Polarization has developed from the original concept of group polarization after the Internet was created and popularized. The reasons for the emergence of online groups are categorized as (1) The Internet provides a wealth of information that people can selectively receive, and algorithmic mechanisms on the web push information based on user data. (2) people can communicate virtually on the Internet, (3) the influence of the media and public figures, (4) the platform’s vetting mechanism of the information, and (5) the accumulation of social contradictions for which the Internet provides a platform for catharsis. At the same time, group polarization may exacerbate the antagonism of different groups in society, but it will also help minorities find a sense of identity and increase cultural inclusiveness.
References
[1] Sunstein C R. Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press, 2009.
[2] Brignall III T W, Van Valey T. The impact of Internet communications on social interaction. Sociological Spectrum, 2005, 25(3): 335-348.
[3] Janis I L. Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. 1982.
[4] Chang J. The role of anonymity in deindividuated behavior: a comparison of deindividuation theory and the social identity model of deindividuation effect. The Pulse, 2008, 6(1): 1-8.
[5] Tajfel H, Turner J C, Austin W G, et al. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader, 1979, 56(65): 9780203505984-16.
[6] Reicher S D, Spears R, Postmes T. A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European review of social psychology, 1995, 6(1): 161-198.
[7] Pariser, E. The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin. 2011.
[8] Chang J. The role of anonymity in deindividuated behavior: a comparison of deindividuation theory and the social identity model of deindividuation effect. The Pulse, 2008, 6(1): 1-8.
[9] DiMaggio P, Evans J, Bryson B. Have American‘s social attitudes become more polarized?. American Journal of Sociology, 1996, 102(3): 690-755.
[10] Le Bon G. The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Courier Corporation, 2002.
[11] Jamieson K H, Cappella J N. Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford University Press, 2008..
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
