Community Governance of “Diverse Subjects” in the Context of Aging Population Based on Cultural Embeddedness Theory: Evidence from Beijing in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/10y3ph45Keywords:
Community Governance, "Diverse Subjects" , Aging Population, Cultural Embeddedness TheoryAbstract
The global aging problem is increasing, which makes the issue of “multi-body governance” of aging communities increasingly important. Using cultural embeddedness theory as the theoretical basis, this paper examines the current situation of pluralistic governance in aging communities and its problems using fieldwork and case study methods, taking communities in Beijing, China, as a case study. This paper finds that for the new commercial housing communities, most of the elderly come from foreign countries, and there are difficulties in endogenous cultural embedding due to different cultural backgrounds and ideologies. In the old central enterprise family home-type community, most elderly people have lived here since childhood and formed a consistent ideology. Still, due to the path dependence in the era of the central enterprise management community, the elderly have difficulties in exogenous cultural embeddedness, such as promulgating new policies and collecting fees. Based on this, this paper draws the following three conclusions: firstly, the multi-body governance of aging communities in many countries is currently in its infancy and needs some time to be perfected. Second, the ideology of the elderly greatly influences the cultural embedding of community governance. Third, aging community governance requires a large amount of financial and personnel investment, which is a considerable burden for many developing countries.
References
[1] Fang, E. F., Scheibye-Knudsen, M., Jahn, H. J., Li, J., Ling, L., Guo, H., ... & Ng, T. B. (2015). A research agenda for aging in China in the 21st century. Aging research reviews, 24, 197-205.
[2] Yeh, K. H., Yi, C. C., Tsao, W. C., & Wan, P. S. (2013). Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: A comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology, 28(3), 277-296.
[3] Dalgaard, C. J., Hansen, C. W., & Strulik, H. (2022). Physiological aging around the World. PloS one, 17(6), e0268276.
[4] Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112(483), F419-F436.
[5] Kang, L. (2015). The Problems and Countermeasures of Constructing the Diversification of City Community Governance Body in China. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 118-120.
[6] Kang, L. (2015). The Problems and Countermeasures of Constructing the Diversification of City Community Governance Body in China. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 118-120.
[7] Somsopon, W., Kim, S. M., Nitivattananon, V., Kusakabe, K., & Nguyen, T. P. L. (2022). Issues and Needs of Elderly in Community Facilities and Services: A Case Study of Urban Housing Projects in Bangkok, Thailand. Sustainability, 14(14), 8388.
[8] Zhou, Y., & Hu, X. (2021). Design and Implementation of Rural Community Elderly Culture Platform Based on Real- Time Social Media Data Mining. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 1-11.
[9] Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2006). Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddedness theory. Dean&Francis Organizational dynamics, 35(4), 316-331.
[10] Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Floyd, S. W. (2003). Interfirm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: A structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427- 442.
[11] Glisby, M., & Holden, N. (2003). Contextual constraints in knowledge management theory: the cultural embeddedness of Nonaka’s knowledge‐creating company. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(1), 29-36.
[12] Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
[13] Fidel, R. (1984). The case study method: A case study. Library and Information Science Research, 6(3), 273-288.
[14] Pillora, S., & McKinlay, P. (2011). Local government and community governance: A literature review. Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, 1-29.
[15] Wang, D., & Li, S. (2022). Innovation of Contemporary Chinese Urban Community Governance under the Perspective of Social Capital: Participation of Multiple Subjects Based on Community Proposals. Sustainability, 15(1), 93.
[16] Bray, D. (2006). Building ‘community’: New strategies of governance in urban China. Economy and Society, 35(4), 530- 549.
[17] Dong, X., Chang, E. S., Zeng, P., & Simon, M. A. (2015). Suicide in the global Chinese aging population: a review of risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions. Aging and disease, 6(2), 121.
[18] Mao, H., & Xie, M. (2022). Practical Exploring of Rural Community Governance in Guangxi—A Case Study of Village L. Law and Economy, 1(1), 10-16.
[19] Han, Q. (2012). The ties that bind: An overview of traditional Chinese family ethics. J Chinese Stud, 1, 85-89.
[20] Krings, M. F., van Wijngaarden, J. D., Yuan, S., & Huijsman, R. (2022). China’s elder care policies 1994–2020: A narrative document analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6141.
[21] Wang, J., & Wu, B. (2017). Domestic helpers as frontline workers in China’s home-based elder care: A systematic review. Journal of women & aging, 29(4), 294-305.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
