The Importance of the Absence of Interpretation in the Museum Context in Promoting Children’s Participation in the Meaning-Making of Artworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/wnmrpz16Abstract
From its inception, the discipline of art history has involved developing and applying modes of interpretation to derive meaning from works of art. Art museums represent an institutionalized model of interpretation. Specialist guides and exhibition catalogs all represent ways of interpreting and understanding the meaning of works of art. However, based on a constructivist system of knowledge, such interpretations create preconceptions about the meaning of the work. It does not contribute to the diversity of its expression. For school-age children at the peak of their creativity, an overemphasis on the presence of interpretation removes their motivation to interpret on their own, making them become replicators rather than producers of the meaning of their work. At the same time, their contribution to the meaning of the work that their unique way of intuitively responding to it is ignored. This paper will, therefore, first argue for the importance of children in the multiple productions of meaning in works of art. It will then build on Davis and Gardner’s “Three-Window Approach” to show how the absence of expert discourse in museums (referred to as the absence of interpretation) facilitates the participation of schoolchildren in the meaning-making of works of art.
References
[1] Arriaga, A. (2010) “Tendencies in the interpretation of works of art in museum education practices,” The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 3(1), pp. 23–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10. 18848/1835-2014/GCP/v03i01/44300.
[2] Bedford, L. (2001) “Storytelling: The real work of museums,” Curator: The Museum Journal, 44(1), pp. 27–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.2151-6952.2001.tb00027. x. Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
[3] Burchenal, M. and Grohe, M. (2007) “Thinking through art: Transforming museum curriculum,”Journal of Museum Education, 32(2), pp. 111– 122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1 080/10598650.2007.11510563.
[4] Dana, J. (1917) “The Gloom of the Museum,” in G. Anderson (ed.) Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Paradigm Shift. Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press, pp. 13–29.
[5] Duckworth, E. (1990) “Museum visitors and the development of understanding,” Journal of Museum Education, 15(1), pp. 4–6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.1 990.11510126.
[6] Franklin, B. and Hyder, T. (2002) “Making it happen: Young children’s rights in action,” in The New Handbook of Children Rights: Comparative Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.
[7] Gombrich, E.H. (1950) The Story of Art. London: Phaidon.
[8] Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994) Museum and their Visitors. Routledge, London.
[9] Jeffers, C. (1999) “When children take the lead in exploring art museums with their adultpartners,” Art Education, 52(6), p. 45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3193795.
[10] Jeffery-Clay, K.R. (1998) “Constructivism in museums: How museums create Meaningful Learning Environments,” Journal of Museum Education, 23(1), pp. 3–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.1998.11510362.
[11] Kieran, M. (1996) “In defense of critical pluralism,” The British Journal of Aesthetics, 36(3), pp. 239–251. Available at: https://doi.org/10. 1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.239.
[12] Lee, T.S.C. (2019) “Curriculum-based interactive exhibition design and family’s learning experiences: A case study of the children’s art museum in Taipei,” Curator: The Museum Journal, 63(1), pp. 83–98. Available at: https://doi. org/10. 1111/cura. 12341.
[13] Mallos, M. (2012) “Collaboration is the key,” Journal of Museum Education, 37(1), pp. 69–80. Available at: https://doi. org/10. 1080/10598650.2012. 11510719.
[14] Mayer, M.M. (2006) “When little girls become junior connoisseurs: A cautionary tale of art museum education in the hyperreal,” Journal of Aesthetic Education, 40(3), pp. 48–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/4140179.
[15] Paris, S.G. (1997) “Situated motivation and informal learning,” Journal of Museum Education, 22(2-3), pp. Dean&Francis 22–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10. 1080/10598650. 1997. 11510356.
[16] Piscitelli, B. and Everett, M.C. (2003) Enhancing young children’s museum experiences: A manual for museum staff. Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.
[17] Pitman-Gelles, B. (1988) “Defining Art Museum Education: Can We Agree?” The Journal of Museum Education, 13(3), pp. 21–23. Available at: https://doi.org/http:// www.jstor.org/stable/40478789.
[18] Reisman, M. (2008) “Using design-based research in informal environments,” Journal ofMuseum Education, 33(2), pp. 175– 185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.20 08.11510598.
[19] Schwartz, Dona. (2007) “If a Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words, Why Are You Reading This Essay?” Social Psychology Quarterly, 70 (4), pp. 319–321. Available at: http://www.jstor. org/stable/20141796.
[20] Specht, S. M. (2010) “Artists’ Statements Can Influence Perceptions of Artwork,” Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), pp. 193–206. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.e
[21] Sykes, M. (1992) “Evaluating exhibits for children: What is a meaningful play experience?”Visitor Studies, 5(1), pp. 227– 233. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1080/10645579209445776.
[22] Szubielska, M. et al. (2018) “The effect of educational workshops in an art gallery on Children’s evaluation and interpretation of Contemporary Art,” Empirical Studies of the Arts, 38(2), pp. 135– 148. Available at: https://doi.org/10. 1177/0276237418790917.
[23] Weier, K. (2004) “Empowering young children in art museums: Letting them take the lead,”Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 5(1), pp. 106– 116. Available at: https://doi. org/10.2304/ciec.2004.5.1.2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
