Framing as a concept: a literature review on its development, andapplication with the example of content analysis

Authors

  • Haotian Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/55x0eq94

Keywords:

framing theory, audience autonomy, journalist objectivity, content analysis

Abstract

Despite its broad application in media communication and public management, Framing has been characterized as
theoretically and empirically vague and has led to operational problems from the uncertainty of theoretical concepts. In
this paper, I compare the definitions of the development process of farming chronically. I conclude with practical and
precise instances to illuminate the benefit of comprehending the media mentioned above effects fully. And the goal here
is to identify and make explicit explanations of the framing effect and to suggest a universal understanding of it and the
benefits of comprehending it more thoroughly. 

References

[1] BoudanaSandrine. 2011. “A definition of journalistic objectivity as a performance.” Media, Culture & Society, 4: 385- 395.

[2] BuddEntman, R. M., & Steinman, C.M.,. 1990. “The affirmative character of U.S. cultural studies.” Critical Studies in MassCommunication, 169-180.

[3] EntmanM., & Rojecki, AR. 1993. “Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement.” political communication, 151-167.

[4] EntmanM.Robert. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication, 12 月 1 日 : 51-58.

[5] FiskeJ. 1987. Television culture. New York: Routledge. GansH. 1979. Deciding what's news. New York: Pantheon Books.

[6] Iyengar& Kinder, D. R.S.,. 1987. News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[7] M.Robert. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication, 12 月 1 日 : 54-57.

[8] RikerH.W. 1986. The art ofpolitical manzpulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

[9] ScheufeleDietram A.by. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication.

[10] TewksburyA. Scheufele & DavidDietram. 2007.“Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication.

[11] TewksburyA. Scheufele& DavidDietram. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication, 9-17.

[12] ZallerRJ. 1992. the nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01