Does algorithm response time influence user satisfaction more than interface aesthetics in Android note-taking applications?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/qjhj3r76Keywords:
Algorithm response time, interface aesthetics, user satisfaction, mobile applications, human-computer interaction, visual design, productivity applicationsAbstract
This study investigates the comparative influence of algorithm response time and interface aesthetics on user satisfaction in Android note-taking applications. While both performance and visual design are recognized as critical factors in user experience, their relative importance in productivity-oriented mobile apps remains underexplored. A quantitative experimental study was conducted with 300 participants using functional prototypes that systematically manipulated response time (fast vs. slow) and interface aesthetics (basic vs. visually enhanced). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression. Results indicate that algorithm response time (β = 0.5691, p < 0.001) exerts a significantly stronger influence on user satisfaction than interface aesthetics (β = 0.3687, p < 0.001), with response time explaining a greater proportion of variance in satisfaction scores. The findings challenge assumptions that visual appeal contributes equally to satisfaction in task-focused applications, highlighting system responsiveness as the primary driver of user retention and positive experience. These results offer practical guidance for mobile app developers and UX designers, suggesting that optimization efforts should prioritize algorithmic efficiency and latency reduction before investing in visual refinements. The study contributes to human-computer interaction literature by providing empirical evidence on the relative weighting of functional and aesthetic factors in mobile productivity contexts.
References
P. (2022). Understanding User Perceptions of Response Delays in Crowd-Powered Conversational Systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555765
Al-Shamaileh, O., & Sutcliffe, A. (2023). Why people choose Apps: An evaluation of the ecology and user experience of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 170, 102965. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102965 Diederich, S., Brendel, A. B., Morana, S., & Kolbe, L. (2022). On the design of and interaction with conversational agents: An organizing and assessing review of human-computer interaction research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 96–138. https://doi. org/10.17705/1jais.00724 Grabowski, A., Bereska, D., Probierz, E., & Gałuszka, A. (2024). The influence of human-computer interface on usability and technology acceptance of VR-based shooting training with a comparison with typical shooting range. Displays, 81, 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2023.102621
Hasan, R. (2025). A Systematic Review Of Human-AI Collaboration In It Support Services: Enhancing User Experience And Workflow Automation. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(3), 01–37. https://doi. org/10.63125/0fd1yb74 Indriastiningsih, E., Violin, V., Syafri, M., Nurbakti, R., & Judijanto, L. (2023). Analysis of The Influence of Customer Satisfaction, Experiental Marketing and E-Service Quality on Loyalty of KAI Commuter Customers. Jur- Dean&Francis Jintao Li nal Sistim Informasi Dan Teknologi, 69–73. https://doi. org/10.60083/jsisfotek.v5i3.305 Jansson, M., Liisanantti, J., Ala-Kokko, T., & Reponen,
J. (2022). The negative impact of interface design, customizability, inefficiency, malfunctions, and information retrieval on user experience: A national usability survey of ICU clinical information systems in Finland. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 159, 104680. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104680 Kaşlı, K., Doğan, M., Özal, C., Doğan, Y., Kılınç, M., &
Aksu Yıldırım, S. (2025). The Effects of Foam Rolling after Task-oriented Circuit Training on Gait, Balance, and Range of Motion in Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurodegenerative Diseases. https://doi. org/10.1159/000550230 Onwudebelu, U., Fasola, O., & Obinna-Isilebo, C. K. (2025). Empowering Undergraduates through Technology: Designing and Implementing a Lecture Slides-Notes- Based Bucket List for Enhanced Productivity. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Computing, 2(2), 23–51. https://www.fnasjournals.com/index.php/FNAS-JMSC/article/view/725 Pan, H., Ding, P., Wang, F., Li, T., Zhao, L., Nan, W., Fu,
Y., & Gong, A. (2024). Comprehensive evaluation methods for translating BCI into practical applications: Usability, user satisfaction and usage of online BCI systems. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, 1429130. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1429130 Pergantis, M., Katsaounidou, A., Lamprogeorgos, A., &
Giannakoulopoulos, A. (2026). Aesthetics and Usability in Digital Art Repositories: Using the iMedius Platform to Collect User Feedback Through Attention Tracking. Arts, 15(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15010009 Pushpakumar, R., Sanjaya, K., Rathika, S., Alawadi, A. H.,
Makhzuna, K., Venkatesh, S., & Rajalakshmi, B. (2023). Human-computer interaction: Enhancing user experience in interactive systems. E3S Web of Conferences, 399, 04037. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339904037
Ridwan, I. B., & Addo, S. (2025). Multi-objective optimization in business analytics: Balancing profitability, risk exposure, and sustainability in strategic decision-making. Int J Adv Res Publ Rev, 2(5), 89–111. https://doi. org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0525.1718 Shama, S. H., Poojary, S. S., Kumar, S., & Kotian, A. L. (2024). Review on Existing Note-Taking and Task-Management Apps. International Journal, 13(2). https://doi. org/10.30534/ijacst/2024/021322024
Veronica, P., & Soriero, D. (2024). Feasibility study of intraoperative surgical navigation with focus on ureteral identification using the EVA system on an animal model. https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1175655
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
