Analysis of the Role of Different Housing Policies in Urban Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Singapore and Hong Kong
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/bc3j4011Keywords:
Housing policy, Urban sustainable development, Affordability, Social segregation, Environmental impactAbstract
Housing policies are pivotal to urban sustainable development. This paper takes Singapore and Hong Kong as case studies, employing literature analysis, case study, and comparative analysis to explore the impacts of distinct housing policies on urban sustainability. The research finds significant disparities between Singapore and Hong Kong in housing affordability, social segregation, and environmental impact. Singapore has effectively addressed the housing needs of the majority of its residents through a government-led public housing policy, establishing itself as a global benchmark for housing governance. In contrast, Hong Kong, constrained by limited land resources and a market-driven housing model, grapples with challenges of soaring housing prices and low affordability. Through indepth analysis of the housing policies of Singapore and Hong Kong, this paper aims to provide cross-regional experiential references for the sustainable development of high-density cities and provides useful references for other cities in formulating and implementing housing policies. This research bears significant theoretical and practical implications
References
[1] (2025). UN-Habitat 2024 Annual Report Sounds the Alarm on the Global Housing Crisis. Human Settlements, (02), 3.
[2] Eberhard von Einem. (2013). Glaeser, Edward (2011): Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 71(2), 173-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13147-013-0217-z.
[3] Tang Changxing. (2017). Research on Singapore‘s Public Housing from the Perspective of Ethnic Governance (Master‘s Thesis, Shanghai International Studies University). Master‘s https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=iSoVlldxB1NJCv PdCgXAFt4RYCMQvbA1lZwwXRFMmsTI_3Tk8CWjuYzYp rWekk5tgV8DBMm8Q4tQSWOWFqgfN0v1u54xgui46oUQ4O 9BZgseigfqODrrzXrUfZIXL9-0KOuejmzsZlKnfF15kCX3zI2_ Z__Z3WnDuL4NUeaTaAY7gLeb3eEljg==&uniplatform=NZK PT&language=CHS
[4] Wei Zongcai, He Shenjing, Liu Yuting & Chen Tingting. (2017). Review and Implementation Effect of Public Housing Policy in Hong Kong after the Return: Based on the Perspective Dean&Francis Baoyi Wang of Social Sustainability. International Urban Planning, 32(03), 34-41.
[5] Zheng Gurui. (2015). Insights from Singapore‘s Green Public Housing Construction Practice for China‘s Green Affordable Housing Construction. Construction Economy, 36(06), 86-88. https://doi.org/10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.201506086.
[6] Wang Jian & Zhou Chao. (2020). Successful Experience and Reference of Singapore in Creating a Highly Livable City. Leadership Science, (14), 118-121. https://doi.org/10.19572/ j.cnki.ldkx.2020.14.034.
[7] Liu Tianyu, Wang Lijun, Cao Yuxin, Chen Fei & Feng Lin. (2024). Case Studies and Implications of High-Density Urban Residential Area Renewal in Asia: A Comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong. New Architecture, (03), 32-37.
[8] Lin, H. (2022, October 28). Queenstown to launch 240 Community Care Apartments next month. Lianhe Zaobao. https://www.baobab.com.sg/news/singapore/ story20221028-1327123
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
