From “Visibility” to “Computability”: How Algorithms Transform User Labour into Symbolic Capital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/5wt2ff92Keywords:
digital capitalism, symbolic capital, alienation, user identity, social mediaAbstract
In the era of digital capitalism, social media platforms have transcended their role as communication tools to become mechanisms that convert user activity into commodified data and symbolic value. This paper investigates how recommendation algorithms and platform architectures translate user interactions into symbolic capital, and how this process reshapes user behavior and identity—producing novel forms of alienation. Employing a theoretical-synthetic approach that integrates Marx’s concept of alienation, Bourdieu’s notions of field, habitus and symbolic capital, and illustrative case analysis (notably TikTok algorithmic nichification and Weibo’s Super Topic mechanics), the study traces three linked processes: (1) the encoding of user actions into quantifiable digital metrics, (2) the institutionalization of those metrics as symbolic capital, and (3) the internalization of metrics-by-users as selfevaluation standards. The findings show that voluntary user labor is appropriated and monetized by platforms, while users come to equate personal worth with algorithmic indicators, thereby deepening both labor- and identityalienation. The paper concludes with the limits of the present study and directions for empirical and comparative follow-up research.
References
[1] Fuller, M. (ed.) (2008) Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15-20.
[2] Lazer, D. (2015) ‘The Rise of the Social Algorithm: Does Content Curation by Facebook Introduce Ideological Bias?’, Science, 348(6239), pp. 1090-1091.
[3] Narayanan, A. (2023) Understanding Social Media Recommendation Algorithms. Available at: https://doi. org/10.7916/khdk-m460 (Accessed: 26 April 2023), pp. 5-6.
[4] Charitsis, V., Laamanen, M. and Lehtiniemi, T. (2024) ‘Towards Algorithmic Luddism: Class Politics in Data Capitalism’, Information, Communication & Society, 28(6), pp. 971-988.
[5] Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[6] Kon, I.S. (1967) ‘The concept of alienation in modern sociology’, Social Research, 34(3), pp. 507–528. Available at: http://www.jstor.com/stable/40969891 (Accessed: 21 October 2025).
[7] Marx, K. (1844) Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
[8] Federal Trade Commission (2024) Examining the Data Practices of Social Media and Video Streaming Services. Washington, DC: FTC.
[9] Rahman, A.M. and Sultana, S. (2024) ‘Digital labor: Challenges, ethical insights, and implications’, ArXiv preprint.
[10] Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.
[11] Fuchs, C. (2015) ‘The Digital Labour Theory of Value and Karl Marx in the Age of Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Weibo’, in Fisher, E. and Fuchs, C. (eds.) Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 26–41.
[12] Kirk, A.W. (2023) For Who Page? TikTok Creators’ Algorithmic Dependencies. Unpublished research paper.
[13] Duffy, B.E., Poell, T. and Nieborg, D. (2021) Influencer Culture and Platform Power: Making, Managing, and Monetizing on Social Media. London: Polity Press.
[14] Simpson, E. & Semaan, B. (2023). Rethinking Creative Labor: A Sociotechnical Examination of Creativity & Creative Work on TikTok. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘23), April 23–28, 2023, Hamburg, Germany. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https:// Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149 doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580649
[15] Qiao, Y. (2023) How Does Weibo’s “Super Topics” Enhance the Experience of Fans?. In: The International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/4/20220325.
[16] Lei, K., Liu, Y., Zhong, S., Liu, Y., Xu, K., Shen, Y. & Yang, M. (2018) Understanding User Behavior in Sina Weibo Online Social Network: A Community Approach. IEEE Access, 6, pp. 13302-13316.
[17] Guo, Z., Tu, H. & Li, Z. (2011) Sina Microblog: An Information-driven Online Social Network. In: 2011 International Conference on Cyberworlds. IEEE, pp. 160-167.
[18] Fuchs, C. (2020) The Social Media Debate: Unpacking the Social, Psychological, and Cultural Effects of Social Media. London: Routledge.
[19] Magalhães, J. C. (2018). Do Algorithms Shape Character? Considering Algorithmic Ethical Subjectivation. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 1-10. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118768301
[20] De Castro, J.C.L. (2017). Between Material and Virtual Worlds: Fetishism and the Discourse of Capitalism. American Imago, 74(1), pp. 23–39. doi:10.1353/aim.2017.0001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
