Technological Convenience: The Shift and Dissolution of Educational Responsibilities

Authors

  • SIYAN MENG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/wbp0k305

Keywords:

Technological Advancement, Educational Responsibility, Responsibility Allocation, Responsibility Assumption

Abstract

In recent years, the advancement of technology and online education, along with the appropriate application of artificial intelligence in education and its resulting impacts, have garnered significant attention. However, research on the relationship between technological development and educational responsibility remains notably insufficient. This paper aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of technological development on the educational field, as well as the phenomenon of shifting and diminishing educational responsibilities during this process. Through this research, it is essential for various educational stakeholders to clearly recognize that while technology can serve as a powerful auxiliary tool, it does not inherently bear any educational responsibilities. The responsibilities of teachers, parents, and other educational professionals cannot be simply transferred to technology, nor should they become blurred due to technological intervention. Based on these analyses and conclusions, this paper proposes several recommendations. First, it is essential to clearly define the boundaries and allocation of responsibilities among different educational stakeholders. Second, efforts must be made to enhance the quality of educational stakeholders through various means, focusing on competency development. Finally, the formulation and implementation of relevant policies play a crucial role in ensuring the proper functioning of educational responsibilities.

References

[1] Qureshi M I, Khan N, Raza H, et al. Digital technologies in education 4.0. Does it enhance the effectiveness of learning? 2021.

[2] Qu J. Impact and Challenges of Technological Innovation on Educational Management. Science, Education & Culture Review, 2024, (04): 17-20.

[3] Tian X, Zhou T. Responsibilities and Strategies for Family Aesthetic Education in the AI Era: Educational Reflections from the Character.AI Incident. Industry and Technology Forum, 2025, 24(12): 96-98.

[4] Zhang Y, Wang X. Science Education for the New Technological Era: Challenges and Opportunities. University and Discipline, 2020, 1(01): 138-144.

[5] Li L. Application and Optimization Strategies of Digital Educational Resources in Youth Science Education. Tianjin Science and Technology, 2025, 52(S1): 92-93+97.

[6] Bian D, Bai L. A Study on the Availability of WeChat Groups in Primary and Secondary Schools from a Home- School Collaboration Perspective. Science and Technology Communication, 2024, 16(11): 138-145.

[7] Criollo-C S, Guerrero-Arias A, Jaramillo-Alcázar Á, et al. Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(9): 4111.

[8] Pu R, Tu Y, Chang B. Collaborative Education for the New Generation: The «Boundaries,» «Boundary Loss,» and «Boundary Establishment» in Home-School Cooperation. Chinese Journal of Education, 2025, (01): 37-44.

[9] Zhao H, Liu Q. Ethical Risks and Governance of Functional Deviation in K-12 School-Home WeChat Groups. Education Guide, 2021, (01): 71-74.

[10] Masnawati E, Aliyah N D, Djazilan M S, et al. Dynamics of intellectual and creative development in elementary school children: The roles of environment, parents, teachers, and learning media. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 2022, 1(1): 33-37.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19