Reforming the Special and Differential Treatment Provisions of the WTO: Constructing a More Equitable and Effective Global Trade System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/ny844n88Keywords:
WTO, Special and Differential Treatment (SDT), Non-Differentiated, More equitable and efficientAbstract
This article focuses on the reform of the Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) provisions within the World Trade Organization (WTO), aiming to explore pathways for establishing a more equitable and efficient global trading system. As is widely acknowledged, when addressing issues, the initial step is to identify the essence of the problem. Subsequently, an in-depth exploration of its causes is undertaken, ultimately leading to the pursuit of solutions. Based on this fundamental logic, the research topic is dissected into three distinct sections for comprehensive analysis, thereby facilitating a clearer and more structured investigation. Firstly, the background of the topic is examined, elucidating why the SDT provisions of the WTO were selected as the subject of study, which is intrinsically linked to the significance of the topic and is reflected in the article through relevant legal knowledge in the field. Secondly, the aspects requiring improvement, namely the current shortcomings, are addressed. Finally, the methodology for improvement is outlined, wherein case studies are analyzed to derive insights and summarize strategies for constructing a more equitable and effective global trading system. In conclusion, the SDT provisions and the WTO framework face multiple challenges that must be addressed to build a more efficient global trading system.
References
[1] Cancer Research UK. (1975) Cancer statistics reports for UK. http://www.cancerreseark.org/aboutcancer/statistics.
[2] Ssozi, R. (2018). The implications of the world trade organization (WTO) agreement on agriculture on trade and agricultural liberalization on food security in Uganda (Doctoral dissertation, Kampala International University).
[3] Díaz-Bonilla, E., Robinson, S., Thomas, M., & Yanoma, Y. Dean&Francis Jiachen Wang (2002). WTO, agriculture, and developing countries: a survey of issues.
[4] Woodhill, J., Surie, M. D., & Jones, K. (2024). Financing food systems transformation and rural revitalization: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Rural Studies, 95, 241- 270.
[5] Yilmaz, I., & Ecemis Yilmaz, H. K. (2024). A consensus framework for evaluating dispute resolution alternatives in international law using an interval-valued type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Applied Sciences, 14(23), 11046.
[6] Rajapaksha, A., Perera, B. A. K. S., & Liyanawatta, T. N. (2025). Framework for Avoidance of Disputes Arising in the Construction Industry due to the Economic Crisis. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(1), 04524039.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
