The Systematic Generation and Multiple Dilemmas of Educational Involution: An Integrative Analytical Framework

Authors

  • Menghui Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/8c5r4584

Keywords:

educational involution, social structure, cultural psychology, technological anxiety, systemic cycle

Abstract

With the continued deepening of globalization, educational competition at all levels of Chinese society is becoming increasingly fierce. “Educational involution,” a social science concept describing systemic over-competition, manifests itself as a social phenomenon in which individuals and families, within the context of limited resources and development opportunities, continuously invest additional time, energy, and capital in their quest for relative advantage, resulting in diminishing returns for individuals and a continuous expansion of collective losses. This article systematically explores the root causes of educational involution in China and its broader social consequences from a multidimensional and integrated perspective. The study finds that educational involution is not driven by a single factor but rather by the combined effects of social structural tensions, intergenerational cultural and psychological inertia, and external anxieties triggered by technological iteration. These intertwined factors not only significantly suppress students’ innovative thinking and compromise their psychological well-being at the micro level, but also, at the macro level, further widen the gap in educational resource distribution and reinforce the entrenched social class structure. Consequently, this article argues that only by deeply understanding the selfperpetuating systemic cycle underlying involution can we lay the necessary theoretical foundation for transcending this predicament and reshaping a healthy educational ecosystem.

References

[1] Yin Zhiyin & Wu Libao. (2025) The origins and solutions of the involutionary development of industry-specific universities. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 1-10. https:// link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1731.G4.20250927.1912.020

[2] Ding Yadong, Hou Xiaoyang & Li Jing. (2025). The mechanism and direction of family education legislation to solve the internal circulation of parents in compulsory education. Education Guide, (09), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.16215/j.cnki. cn44-1371/g4.2025.09.007. Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149

[3] Huang Weixia. (2025). The hidden worries and countermeasures of education involution caused by the rise of quality-oriented training under the background of “double reduction” policy, (14), 23-25. https://doi.org/ CNKI:SUN:JYYR.0.2025-14-005.

[4] Sun Yu & Ren Miaomiao. (2025). “Double Reduction” and the Development of Students’ Core Competencies from a Time Perspective. Contemporary Educational Science,(03), 14-24. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:SDJK.0.2025-03-002.

[5] Liang Wei & Chen Feng. (2025). Circle “involution”: The learning dilemma of Z generation college students and its generating logic. China Youth Research,(05), 21-28. https://doi. org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2025.0045.

[6] Sun Yuantao & Xiong Dianshuang. (2023). Why does educational involution occur? — A theoretical reflection based on the merit system. Fudan Education Forum, 21 (04), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.13397/j.cnki.fef.2023.04.013.

[7] Xu Hong & Dong Zefang. (2025). Concept clarification, ambiguity reflection and growth support for students from disadvantaged families. Jiangsu Higher Education,(09), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2025.09.006.

[8] Chen Cheng & Bao Lei. (2022). The mechanism of involution and the solution to involution in education. China Examination,(02), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.19360/ j.cnki.11-3303/g4.2022.02.010.

[9] Hu Xiaoyong, Liu Xueni, Chen Lishi, Liu Yanfan & Liu Xiaohong. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into basic education: promoting internal circulation or enhancing innovation? Open Education Research,31 (02), 45-54. https:// doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2025.02.005.

[10] Wu Qing & Wu Zhijing. (2025). The impact of academic involution on college students’ innovative thinking: A research report based on a university in Jiangsu. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education,16 (02), 12-19. https://doi.org/ CNKI:SUN:CXYC.0.2025-02-017.

[11] Guan Bowen & Gao Ge. (2025). A portrait description of the phenomenon of youth “involution” and an analysis of its causes and countermeasures - based on the theory of interactive ritual chain. Theoretical Observation,(08), 76-81. https://doi.org/ CNKI:SUN:LLGC.0.2025-08-014.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19