Algorithmic Transparency, User Control, and Adolescent Self-Efficacy: A Review and Research Agenda (2020–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/7p375g87Keywords:
Recommendation algorithms, adolescents, self-efficacy, metacognitionAbstract
Personalized recommendation algorithms structure what adolescents see and when they see it, potentially shaping self-regulatory outcomes. This review synthesizes recent empirical work (2020–2025) on how algorithmic transparency and user controls relate to adolescents’ task specific self-efficacy and metacognitive processes (planning, monitoring, evaluation). Evidence from large surveys links higher general self-efficacy to fewer emotional symptoms even when negative social media experiences are considered. Mixed methods and experimental interface studies indicate that explanations (e.g., “why am I seeing this?”) and steerable controls (e.g., topic filters, reset/diversify) are associated with greater perceived transparency, trust, and reflective engagement, while low transparency, engagement optimized ranking is associated with diminished perceived control. Converging across educational and open platform contexts, these patterns suggest that clarity and controllability may help preserve adolescents’ efficacy beliefs and support metacognitive regulation. However, most studies rely on cross-sectional designs or proximal indicators (e.g., trust, connectedness) rather than direct metacognition/efficacy measures, and field experiments on live platforms remain scarce. This review outline design implications (plain language explanations; visible impact views; low friction steering) and educational directions (algorithmic literacy instruction), and propose a research agenda emphasizing preregistered field studies, validated instruments for efficacy/metacognition, and transparent analytic reporting. Together, these steps can link algorithmic design choices to measurable benefits for adolescent users across cultural and platform contexts.
References
[1] Bonsaksen, T., Schoultz, M., Leung, J., Ruffolo, M., & Thygesen, H. (2023). Negative social media–related experiences and lower general self-efficacy associated with depressive symptoms in Norwegian adolescents: A cross-sectional analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 9853181. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2023.9853181
[2] Pérez Vallejos, E. (2021). The impact of algorithmic decision‑making processes on young people’s online experiences and well‑being. Health Informatics Journal, 27(4), 1324–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220972750
[3] Chaudhry, M. A., Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2022). A transparency index framework for AI in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03220. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2206.03220
[4] Ooge, J., Dereu, L., & Verbert, K. (2023). Steering recommendations and visualising its impact: Effects on adolescents’ trust in e‑learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00098. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.00098
[5] Ooge, J., Vanneste, A., Szymanski, M., & Verbert, K. (2025). Designing visual explanations and learner controls to engage adolescents in AI‑supported exercise selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16034. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.16034
[6] Taylor, S. H., Bazarova, N. N., & Wohn, D. Y. (2024). The “lonely algorithm” problem: Algorithmic personalization predicts social connectedness on TikTok. Journal of Computer‑Mediated Communication, 29(5), zmae017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/ zmae017
[7] McAlister, K. L., Rugiero, K. J., & Davidson, T. M. (2024). Social media use in adolescents: Benefits, bans, and emotional regulation recommendations. JMIR Mental Health, 11(1), e64626. https://doi.org/10.2196/64626
[8] De, D., Grossman, Z., & Schulman, J. (2025). Social media algorithms and teen addiction: Neurophysiological pathways, reward circuitry, and emotional regulation consequences. Journal of Adolescent Neuropsychology, 12(1), 45–62.
[9] Zhang, Y. (2022). A review on the development and promotion of metacognition in primary school students. Education Research and Review, 14, 123–134. [In Chinese]
[10] Tan, B., Yang, C., & Xiong, Y. (2025). Using machine learning algorithms to predict students’ self‑efficacy: Evidence from PISA data. Learning Analytics and Educational Data Science, 7(2), 123–137.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
