Visible Voices: Street Art, Youth Identity, and the Aesthetics of Resistance

Authors

  • Yi Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/wwjn6h03

Keywords:

Street Art, Urban Youth, Subculture, Public Art, Legitimacy

Abstract

Street art has become a visible and contested practice in many global cities, closely tied to the everyday experiences of young people. Rather than being treated simply as vandalism or decoration, street art functions as a cultural form through which youth negotiate identity, belonging, and resistance. This paper takes the case of graffiti in Manchester as a point of entry, positioning it within broader debates on subcultural expression and public art. The analysis draws on case study materials and theoretical perspectives to explore two central questions: how street art functions as a medium of youth identity and resistance, and whether it can be legitimized within the framework of urban civility. This paper suggests that while street art empowers young people to make their voices visible in the city, it also exposes tensions between grassroots creativity and institutional control. These dynamics offer insights into cultural policy, urban governance, and the role of youth expression in contemporary public life.

References

[1] Gariso, A. (2023) ‘Graffiti, street art and public space regulation’, European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes (CPCL), 6(2), pp. 55–73.

[2] Gonçalves, K. and Milani, T.M. (2022) ‘Street art/art in the street—semiotics, politics, economy’, Social Semiotics, 32(4), pp. 425–443.

[3] Puspita, D.B.P. (2024) ‘The role of graffiti as an expression of youth identity’, Commsphere: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi.

[4] Kühnapfel, C., Trupp, M., Pelowski, M. and Fingerhut, J. (2025) ‘On the impact of public art: How engaging a pedestrianlevel exhibition improves neighborhood connectedness and wellbeing’, Wellbeing, Space and Society, 8, 100252.

[5] Macdonald, N. (2001) The Graffiti Subculture: Youth, Masculinity and Identity in London and New York. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149

[6] Riggle, N.A. (2010) ‘Street art: The transfiguration of the commonplace’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 68(3), pp. 243–257.

[7] Mikuni, J., Dehove, M., Dörrzapf, L., Moser, M.K., Resch, B., Böhm, P., Prager, K., Podolin, N., Oberzaucher, E. and Leder, H. (2024) ‘Art in the city reduces the feeling of anxiety, stress, and negative mood: A field study examining the impact of artistic intervention in urban public space on well-being’, Wellbeing, Space and Society, 7, 100215.

[8] Young, A. (2014) Street Art, Public City: Law, Crime and the Urban Imagination. London: Routledge.

[9] Poon, S.T.F. (2023) ‘Talent & Tagging in Harmony: A study of graffiti art as subculture and aesthetic expression of urbanization in Malaysia’, Journal of Urban Culture Research, 26, pp. 5–28.

[10] Wardhana, N. and Ellisa, E. (2023) ‘Youth tactics of urban space appropriation: Case study of skateboarding and graffiti’, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering.

[11] Evans, G.L. (2025) ‘Graffiti, street art and ambivalence’, Humanities, 14(4), 90.

[12] Brazioli, C. and Brighenti, A.M. (2025) ‘Graffiti in the lawscape: Seizing the circuits of valorization of an elusive and resistant practice’, Humanities, 14(5), 108.

[13] Centea, S. (2022) Public space negotiation around Stockholm’s legal graffiti walls. Stockholm: KTH/Stockholm University (Master’s thesis).

[14] Garrido-Castellano, C. (2024) ‘Public art and social media: Street art tourism, sociocultural value, and the economy of attention’, Community Development Journal, 59(3), pp. 533– 550.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19