Marginality and Integration in Cross- Cultural Classrooms: A Sociological Analysis of the Learning Experiences of International Students in China - From the Perspective of Discourse, Mobility, and Identity Negotiation in the Context of Educational Internationalization

Authors

  • Ziyi An

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/k28nhz40

Keywords:

Cross-Cultural Education, International Students, Educational Internationalization, Symbolic Capital

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the continuous deepening of the internationalization of global higher education, China has rapidly emerged as a key destination for international students. However, there remains widespread debate regarding whether the learning experiences of international students in China truly embody the core spirit of an “internationalized classroom”. Based on a sociological perspective, this paper employs Bourdieu’s capital theory and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to explore the learning experiences, cultural interactions, and identity negotiation processes of international students in China. The study points out that within the institutional framework of educational internationalization, international students often find themselves caught in the tension between “symbolic inclusion” and “structural exclusion”: they are constructed as the “other” in terms of language, teaching methods, and classroom interactions, and their learning experiences are institutionally marginalized. By analyzing texts from social media and educational policy discourses, this paper reveals the cultural power logic and the mechanism of symbolic capital reproduction in the process of the internationalization of higher education in China. The study argues that international students achieve identity negotiation through the transformation of cultural capital and discourse strategies, which reflects the agency and resistance of individuals in the field of cross-cultural education. This paper calls for “pluralistic dialogue” and “cultural equality” to be taken as the core orientations of internationalized education in both policy-making and teaching practice, so as to promote cross-cultural classrooms to move from symbolic inclusion to genuine integration.

References

Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

Guo, S., & Chase, M. (2019). Internationalisation of higher education: Integrating international students into Canadian academic environment. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(5), 1–15.

Knight, J. (2015). Updated definition of internationalization. International Higher Education, 33(2), 2–3.

Marginson, S. (2019). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287–301.

Marginson, S. (2020). Global science and national comparisons: Beyond the global ranking regime. Palgrave Macmillan.

Shin, H., & Kubota, R. (2020). Posthumanist perspectives on international education. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(8), 681–694. Note: Citations in the main text should correspond to the references listed. The order of references should be consistent with the order in which they are cited in the main text. The first reference cited in the main text should be the first one in the reference list.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19