How does the lack of control trigger negative behavioral feedback from consumers? ——A study on the negative emotions caused by the lack of control based on the SOR framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/0xkg1e06Keywords:
AI service agents, perceived control, attribution, consumer emotion, S–O–R frameworkAbstract
As AI-powered service agents become increasingly embedded in customer service operations, understanding how these systems shape consumer experiences is critical. This study investigates the psychological pathway through which perceived control deficits in AI service interactions trigger consumer emotional responses. Drawing on the extended S–O–R framework, we conceptualize perceived control loss as the key stimulus (S) that activates attribution processes (O), leading to negative emotions (R) such as frustration, anger, or helplessness. A thorough literature review reveals that prior studies have largely overlooked how perceived control functions as a cognitive stimulus that intensifies consumer blame assignment and emotional reactions in automated service contexts. By clarifying this process, our research advances theoretical insights into AI–consumer interactions and offers a practical roadmap for managing emotional risks in automated service environments. The proposed model also highlights how consumers’ attribution of service failures—whether to the AI agent, system design, or brand—can shape the intensity and direction of their emotional responses. This study thereby enriches the understanding of consumer cognition–emotion pathways in AI services and provides guidance for balancing automation efficiency with user experience.
References
[1] Chen Qian, Lu Yaobin, Gong Yeming, Xiong Jie. Can AI chatbots help retain customers? Impact of AI service quality on customer loyalty. Internet Research, 2023, 33(6): 2205-2243.
[2] Castillo D, Canhoto A I, Said E. When AI–chatbots disappoint–the role of freedom of choice and user expectations in attribution of responsibility for failure. Information Technology & People, 2024.
[3] Castillo D, Canhoto A I, Said E. The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 2021, 41(13-14): 900-925.
[4] Vafaei-Zadeh A, Nikbin D, Wong S L, Hanifah H. Investigating factors influencing AI customer service adoption: an integrated model of stimulus–organism–response (SOR) and task-technology fit (TTF) theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2024.
[5] Vindytia M, Balqiah T E. AI Marketing Impact on Consumer Behavior: An SOR Model Analysis of Online Food Delivery Services. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), 2024, 15(2): 215- 228.
[6] Fan Hua, Han Bing, Gao Wei. (Im) Balanced customeroriented behaviors and AI chatbots’ Efficiency–Flexibility performance: The moderating role of customers’ rational choices. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2022, 66: 102937.
[7] Elayat A M A, Elalfy R M. Using SOR theory to examine the impact of AI Chatbot quality on Gen Z’s satisfaction and advocacy within the fast-food sector. Young Consumers, 2025, 26(2): 352-383.
[8] Gao Li, Li Gang, Tsai Fusheng, Gao Chen, Zhu Mengjiao, Qu Xiaopian. The impact of artificial intelligence stimuli on customer engagement and value co-creation: the moderating role of customer ability readiness. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 2023, 17(2): 317-333.
[9] Skinner E A. A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(3): 549-570.
[10] Guo Lin, Lotz S L, Tang Chuanyi, Gruen T W. The role of perceived control in customer value cocreation and service recovery evaluation. Journal of Service Research, 2016, 19(1): 39-56.
[11] Legaspi R, Xu W, Konishi T, Wada S. Positing a sense of agency-aware persuasive AI: its theoretical and computational frameworks. International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 2021: 3-18. Cham: Springer.
[12] Shneiderman B, Plaisant C. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education India, 2010.
[13] Belanche D, Casaló L V, Flavián C, Schepers J. Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda. The Service Industries Journal, 2020, 40(3-4): 203-225.
[14] Gelbrich K. Anger, frustration, and helplessness after service failure: coping strategies and effective informational support. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2010, 38(5): 567-585.
[15] Van Vaerenbergh Y, Orsingher C, Vermeir I, Larivière B. A meta-analysis of relationships linking service failure attributions to customer outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 2014, 17(4): 381-398.
[16] Wolosin R J, Sherman S J, Till A. Effects of cooperation and competition on responsibility attribution after success and failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1973, 9(3): 220-235.
[17] Mozafari N, Schwede M, Hammerschmidt M, Weiger W H. Claim success, but blame the bot? User reactions to service failure and recovery in interactions with humanoid service robots, 2022.
[18] Van Raaij W F, Pruyn A T H. Customer control and evaluation of service validity and reliability. Psychology & Marketing, 1998, 15(8): 811-832.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
