Human-Centered Design Strategies for Prosthetics Based on User Needs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/qb2xnn62Keywords:
Prosthetic Design, Human-Centered Design, Biomechanical Adaptability, User Experience, Intelligent Prosthesis, Rehabilitation Engineering, Assistive TechnologyAbstract
This study systematically develops a comprehensive framework for human-centered prosthetic design, directly responding to the evolving needs of domestic prosthesis users. Integrating theoretical modeling with empirical investigation, the research identifies core design determinants aligned with user expectations. Employing a mixed-method approach, including large-scale surveys and deep interviews, the study explores Chinese prosthetic users’ functional, emotional, and social integration needs. Findings reveal a notable gap between current products and user aspirations, especially in biomechanical adaptability, aesthetic customization, intelligent interaction, and seamless daily integration. A novel ‘cultural context–social integration’ design paradigm is proposed, transcending purely technical models. These interdisciplinary insights support progress in rehabilitation engineering, assistive technology, and inclusive product policy. The system establishes a comprehensive framework for human-centered prosthetic design, directly addressing the evolving needs of domestic prosthetic users. Through integrating theoretical modeling with empirical research, it identifies core design elements that align with user expectations.
References
[1] Chen, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). Accessibility of intelligent prosthetics in low-income regions. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 17(2), 45–62.
[2] Chen, L., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Appearance preferences and social perception in young prosthetic users. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(12), 2987–2998.
[3] European Commission. (2022). BIOFUSION: Bionic Fusion for Advanced Prosthetics – Final Report. Brussels: EU Horizon Research and Innovation Framework Programme.
[4] Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2023). User journey mapping in assistive device design: A case study of prosthetic limbs. Design Studies, 80, 101101.
[5] Li, M., & Zhang, H. (2021). Ergonomic evaluation system for lower limb prostheses. Journal of Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(3), 112–125.
[6] MIT Media Lab. (2023). Neural interface prosthetics: Bridging mind and machine. Technology Review, 126(4), 38–45.
[7] Tang, W., & Li, X. (2020). The evolution of prosthetic limb design: From mechanical to intelligent systems. Advanced Robotics, 34(10), 667–680.
[8] Wang, Y., & Wang, L. (2023). Cultural sensitivity in prosthetic design: A cross-cultural comparative study. Design for Inclusion, 11(2), 45–61.
[9] Wang, J., & Zhang, M. (2022). Construction and effect evaluation of humanized nursing scheme for prosthetic patients. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 57(12), 1456–1461.
[10] World Health Organization. (2023). Global Report on Assistive Technology (GReAT). Geneva: WHO Press.
[11] Journal of Assistive Technologies. (2023). Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Medical Information Press.
[12] You, W., et al. (2024). Identifying user-experience gaps in current prosthetic design: A large-scale survey in China. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 48(1), 52–63.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
