The Impact of Short-Video Platform Algorithms on Social Aesthetics and Public Cognition

Authors

  • Wentong Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/fa0je598

Keywords:

Short-video platforms, Algorithmic aesthetics, Aesthetic homogenization

Abstract

In today's digital age, short-video platforms have become the dominant force in online consumption. With the seamless integration of technology and entertainment, they have attracted billions of users worldwide. The rapid growth in the number of these platforms is attributed to the complex algorithms that support content recommendation systems, which effectively customize user experiences based on individual preferences. However, this technological advancement raises profound questions about its broader impact on public perception and social aesthetics. This study investigates how public cognition and social aesthetics are affected by algorithms used by short-video platforms. To examine the standardization process of algorithmic aesthetics and the cognitive reshaping effect of immersive media design, it employs content analysis techniques and blends interdisciplinary ideas of communication studies, computer science, and cognitive psychology. According to studies, the platform's recommendation algorithm, which was developed using collaborative filtering and deep learning, homogenizes aesthetic preferences with the aid of a "tag system" and "imitation learning" mechanisms. In contrast, features like auto-play and infinite scrolling cause users' attention to become fragmented and rely on the algorithm. In the meantime, algorithmic traffic distribution exacerbates the cognitive dilemma of the country's broad entertainment trend and marginalizes specific aesthetics.

References

[1] Elsheikh, Dalia, Daniel Jackson, and Nael Jebril. “The power of numbers: Four ways metrics are transforming the news.” Digital Journalism 12.8 (2024): 1165-1183.

[2] Martin, Emily. “Steps Toward a Cultural History of Experimental Psychology in the Light of Social and Digital Media.” Anthropology Now 16.2 (2024): 13-26.

[3] Davis, Owen F. “Artificial Intelligence and Worker Power.” (2024).

[4] Cover, Rob. Identity and digital communication: Concepts, theories, practices. Routledge, (2023).

[5] Yang, Zeyang, et al. “Can watching online videos be addictive? A qualitative exploration of online video watching among Chinese young adults.” International journal of environmental research and public health 18.14 (2021): 7247.

[6] Anderson, C. W. “Practice, interpretation, and meaning in today’s digital media ecosystem.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 97.2 (2020): 342-359.

[7] Tsybulsky, Dina, and Ilya Levin. “Science teachers’ worldviews in the age of the digital revolution: Structural and content analysis.” Teaching and Teacher Education 86 (2019): 102921.

[8] Jaeger, Paul T. “Telecommunications policy and individuals with disabilities: Issues of accessibility and social inclusion in the policy and research agenda.” Telecommunications Policy 30.2 (2006): 112-124.

[9] Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004.

[10] Sun, Haochen. “The Right to Know Social Media Algorithms.” Harv. L. & Pol’y Rev. 18 (2023): 1.

[11] Mazurek, Daniel Charles. ““No Mind to Lose”? A Critical Analysis of Late 20th-Century Fantasies of Neuroscience and Digital Media.” (2022).

[12] Liu, Jiaying, and Yan Zhang. “Modeling Health Video Consumption Behaviors on Social Media: Activities, Challenges, and Characteristics.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human- Computer Interaction 8.CSCW1 (2024): 1-28.

[13] Nahum-Shani, Inbal, et al. “Engagement in digital interventions.” American Psychologist 77.7 (2022): 836.

[14] Typografia, Design, et al. “Media and Communication, 2024, Volume 12 Geomedia Futures: Imagining Tomorrow’s Mediatized Places and Place-Based Technologies.”

[15] Karjus, Andres, et al. “Compression ensembles quantify aesthetic complexity and the evolution of visual art.” EPJ Data Science 12.1 (2023): 21.

[16] Richards, Richard A. “Engineered niches and naturalized aesthetics.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75.4 (2017): 465-477.

[17] Cinque, Toija. Emerging Digital Media Ecologies: The Concept of Medialogy. Routledge, 2024.

[18] Vuong, Quan Hoang, and Nancy K. Napier. “Making creativity: the value of multiple filters in the innovation process.” International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems 3.4 (2014): 294-327.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23