The Geopolitical and Economic Impact of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act on the Outbreak of World War II

Authors

  • Hengyu Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/rww1eh81

Keywords:

Smoot-Hawley tariff law, tariff war, World War II, geopolitics, geo-economics

Abstract

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, as one of the most protectionist tariff policies in American history, triggered a tariff war that greatly disrupted the international trade system and relations at the time, leading to serious geopolitical crises and economic turmoil. And these geopolitical and economic changes have an indelible relationship with the subsequent occurrence of World War II. The reasons for the enactment of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act. Against the backdrop of the global economic depression and collapse of the trade system caused by the Smoot-Hawley tariff law, the economies of Germany and Japan collapsed, and domestic society experienced turmoil, providing an opportunity for fascism to come to power; The relative disadvantage of Germany and Japan in terms of resources and the number of colonies led them to embark on geopolitical and economic expansion to alleviate their own economic crisis. At the same time, due to the domestic economic depression caused by the tariff war, Britain and the United States mainly focused their energy on domestic affairs. In international relations, they began to prioritize their own economic interests and chose appeasement policies because they had significant economic interests with fascist countries.

References

[1] HUNSTAD M, VIDOJEVIC M. Trade Tariffs : Unprecedented But Not Uncharted. 2025, last accessed 2025/7/20, https://ntam.northerntrust.com/content/dam/ northerntrust/pws/nt/documents/investment-management/tradetariffs-unprecedented-but-not-uncharted.pdf.

[2] Mitchener K, Wandschneider K. Trade Wars and Currency Wars: Lessons from History. 2025/4, last accessed 2025/7/22, https://www.ifw-kiel.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/ IfW-Publications/fis-import/4f9b68e2-2dde-4684-b36f- 981a44c505da-KPB_189_en.pdf.

[3] Irwin, D. A. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff: A Quantitative Assessment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1988, 80(2): 326-334.

[4] Goswami A. Trade, Tariffs, and Economic Development: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. 2025/3/8, last accessed 2025/7/22, https://smartinfer.com/essays/random/ tariffstradeeconomy.pdf.

[5] Sheng L, Felix do Nascimento D. Love and trade war: China and the US in historical context. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan Singapore, 2021.

[6] Armstrong S, Quah D. Economics for the global economic order: the tragedy of epic fail, 2023/10/27. last accessed 2025/7/22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18052.

[7] Eichengreen B. The political economy of the Smoot-Hawley tariff. International Political Economy, 1986, Working Paper 2001:37-46.

[8] Irwin D A, Kroszner R S. Log-rolling and economic interests in the passage of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. 1996, 45(1):173-200.

[9] Jonas,Manfred. The United States and Germany: a Diplomatic History. Ithaca and London : Cornell University Press, 1984.

[10] David F. Crew. Hitler and the Nazis. A History in Documents. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005.

[11] Luo Zhigang. Economic Expansion of Hitler’s Germany in Southeast Europe from 1933 to 1940. Historical Research, 1990, (2): 86-96.

[12] Wu Yin. The Changes in Economic Relations between Japan and the United States before the War and Their Impact on Japan’s Foreign Policy. World History, 1989, (6):41-47 and 159.

[13] Historical Science Society of Japan. History of the Pacific War: 2. Sino Japanese War. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten Publishing Co., 1971.

[14] Kiyotaka Kuroba. The 15 Year Struggle between Japan and China. Tokyo: Education Press, 1977.

[15] Xu Ningning. The Evolution of the “Three Rings” Trade and Japanese Aggression War (1929-1945). Master’s thesis, Xiangtan University, 2013.

[16] Fan Kang and Song Zexing. Foreign Economic History. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 1982 .

[17] Great Britain Foreign Office. Political and Economic Planning Report on International Trade, London: Great Britain Foreign Office, 1937.

[18] Central Statistical Office. Annual Abstract of Statistics, No. 88, 1938-1950. London: Central Statistical Office, 1952.

[19] Thomas Patterson. American Foreign Policy. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 1989.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23