The Consent of the Governed:Dialogue as the Foundation of Stable Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/1d23xk46Keywords:
Democracy, Populism, Elites, Dialogue, Political Legitimacy, Civic TrustAbstract
This study explores the tension between elite knowledge and public sentiment as mutually opposing forces within democratic government. Technocratic elites may offer expertise and efficiency, yet their remoteness from lived experience may bring alienation and lack of legitimacy. On the other hand, unruly populism fueled by sentiment and grievance may undermine institutions and run the risk of descending into instability or despotism. Citing philosophers such as Plato, Burke, and Paine, among others, and recent instances such as Brexit, the riot on Capitol Hill, and China’s Zero-COVID strategy, this article contends that democracy cannot prosper by favoring either intellectual elites or emotive crowds exclusively. Instead, resilient democratic institutions would need to engage dialogue, empathy, and moral accountability such that expertise is held responsible and public feeling is channelled constructively. In positing models from Scandinavia and New Zealand, this study suggests that democracy survives less through ascendancy than through recurring dialogue that sustains credibility and reciprocal trust among rulers and ruled.
References
Belov, A. (2025). Civic dialogue and the trust gap: Elites and the people in civil society. Futurity Philosophy.
Burke, E. (2017). Reflections on the revolution in France (F. Canavan, Ed.). Liberty Fund. (Original work published 1790)
Carugati, F., & Levi, M. (2021). A moral political economy: Present, past, and future. Cambridge University Press.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2021). The Routledge handbook on Scandinavian politics. Routledge.
Delanty, G., & Turner, S. P. (Eds.). (2011). Routledge international handbook of contemporary social and political theory. Routledge.
Frenkel, M. (2025). Technocracy and the alienation of the public. Political Theory Quarterly.
Gade, P. J., Merrill, J. C., & Blevens, F. R. (2001). Twilight of press freedom: The rise of people’s journalism. Taylor & Francis.
Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. https://scholar. harvard.edu/files/bonikowski/files/gidron_bonikowski_ populismlitreview_2013.pdf
Greenblatt, S. (2004). Will in the world: How Shakespeare became Shakespeare. W. W. Norton & Company.
Hanagan, N. (2025). Remembering Thomas Spragens: Technocracy and moral irrationalism. American Political Thought.
Heywood, A. (2003). Political ideologies: An introduction (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Josse, P. (2019). Popular sovereignty without populism: Autonomy, democracy, and citizen endorsement. University of Essex Working Papers in Political Science.
Locke, J. (1988). Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1690)
Malicse, A. (2024). Alternative solutions to a failed democratic system due to ignorant voters and black propaganda politics. PhilPapers. https://philpapers.org/rec/MALAST-4
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477- 7053.2004.00135.x
Ober, J. (2018). Demopolis: Democracy before liberalism in theory and practice. University of California Press.
Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. Secker & Warburg. https://nafezlyproduction.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/projects/10 2737_66dd089b337fb_1725761691.pdf
Pilet, J.-B., Vittori, D., Paulis, E., & Rojon, S. (2024). The preferred governing actors of populist supporters: Survey evidence from eight European countries. European Political Science Review, 16(1), 34–55.
Plato. (2007). The Republic (D. Lee, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work ca. 375 BCE)
Sandel, M. J. (2010). Justice: What’s the right thing to do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Shipman, T. (2017). Fall out: A year of political mayhem. HarperCollins.
Skidmore-Hess, D. J. (1993). Philosopher-kings and technocratic alternatives: A comparative view. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Streeck, W. (2016). How will capitalism end? Essays on a failing system. Verso Books.
Tsakalou, E. (2023). Empathy as a common ground between moral development and active citizenship: An Aristotelian approach. Futurity Philosophy, 3(2), 42–56. https://futurityphilosophy.com/index.php/FPH/article/view/148/71
Voutyras, S. (2024). Emotive populism and the erosion of democratic norms in interwar Europe. Historical Politics Review, 22(1), 59–76.
Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2023). The White Paper Protests and statecitizen dynamics in post-zero-COVID China. China Quarterly, 255(3), 415–438.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
