"Cross-industry Collaboration" Marketing Strategy and Communication: Taking the Collaboration between Duolingo and Luckin as an Example

Authors

  • Peilin Lyu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/b9eya370

Keywords:

Cross-industry collaboration, communication, marketing

Abstract

In the current market context where cross-industry collaborations are increasingly prevalent yet risk becoming homogenized, the collaboration between Luckin Coffee and Duolingo stands out as a representative and groundbreaking case of success. This study takes this co-branded campaign as its research focus and, drawing on narrative theory, participatory culture, and emotional branding theory, employs a case study approach to examine its marketing communication strategies in depth. The study identifies three effective strategies: (1) precise targeting of multi-segment audiences; (2) emotional storytelling centered on a "wedding" theme to enhance user immersion and emotional bonding; and (3) a participatory communication mechanism that stimulates user-generated content (UGC) and brand interaction, thereby facilitating viral dissemination. The results indicate that communication strategies centered on emotional narrative and user co-creation can effectively counteract marketing homogenization, enhance the symbolic value of the brand, and sustain long-term user engagement. This research provides theoretical implications and practical strategic insights for future cross-industry collaborations.

References

[1] Blackett T., Russell N. Co-branding—the science of alliance. Journal of Brand Management, 2000, 7(3): 161-170.

[2] Varadarajan P. R., Rajaratnam D. Symbiotic marketing revisited. The Journal of Marketing, 1986, 7(1).

[3] MiDi Data. Insights into brand collaboration marketing trends - discovery report. The Findings, 2024. www.fxbaogao. com/detail/4365564.

[4] Francis T., Hoefel F. True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company, 2018, 12(2): 1-10.

[5] Blattberg R. C., Deighton R. Manage marketing by the customer equity test. Harvard Business Review, 1996, 74(4): 136-144.

[6] Matsa P. A. Marketing to Gen Z: Understanding the preferences and behaviors of next generation. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., 2024, 6.

[7] Fournier S. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1998, 24(4): 343-373.

[8] Purwanti S., Mas’ud M. Consumption practice in the Baudrillard perspective. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 2019, 86(2): 40-50.

[9] Green M. C., Brock T. C. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(5): 701.

[10] Bagozzi R. P., Gopinath M., Nyer P. U. The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1999, 27(2): 184- 206.

[11] Shifman L. Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2013, 18(3): 362-377.

[12] Jenkins H. Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: NYU Press, 2006.

[13] Wang X., Nie Y., Zhou N. An exploratory study on the definition and characteristics of brand teasing concept. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 35(01): 26-34.

[14] Fan B. Research on the impact of brand interaction on customer brand fit behavior from the perspective of social media (Master’s thesis, North China University of Technology). 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23