A Dual-Path Analysis Based on the EPPM Framework of Threat and Efficacy Appraisal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/te0cs120Keywords:
Rumor dissemination, Dissemination behavior, High-threat context, EPPM (Extended Parallel Process Model)Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the dissemination of health-related online rumors (e.g., "vaccines alter DNA," "disinfectant cures COVID-19") increased by 320% year-on-year (WHO, 2021), causing public panic and inappropriate behaviors. The rumor exposure rate among Chinese netizens reached 78.6%, with health-related rumors accounting for 42.3% (CNNIC, 2021), highlighting the urgency of governance. Existing research often focuses on single-path mechanisms of rumor dissemination: the emotional path (online social anxiety → rumor dissemination, Liao Jiali, 2021) or the cognitive path (risk perception → dissemination behavior, Slovic, 1987). However, these fail to explain why some audiences resist rumors in high-threat situations. This study employs the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) to address this gap through its dual-path decision mechanism of "threat-efficacy" appraisal. Conclusion: This research validates that within the Chinese context, high media trust can effectively inhibit rumor dissemination triggered by anxiety and risk perception, providing theoretical and empirical support for precise rumor governance based on the EPPM model. Future research should integrate neuroscience and cross-cultural perspectives to deepen the mechanistic understanding.
References
[1] Zhang Yan, & Zhou Xiang. (2020). The Interaction Effect of Risk Perception and Anxiety on Online Rumor Transmission in Public Health Emergencies. Journalism & Communication, 27(6), 78-94.
[2] Yan Qisong. (2019). An Empirical Study on Young People’s Online Social Anxiety in the Self-Media Environment. Modern Communication, (4), 6+5.
[3] Song Hongyan. (2020). Research on the Relationship between College Students’ Information Dissemination and Risk Cognition in Social Sudden Public Events. China Radio & TV Academic Journal, (9), 8–12.
[4] Jia Zhemin, & Meng Tianguang. (2020). Information as the Axis: Media Use, Information Needs, and Media Trust during the COVID-19 Pandemic. E-Government, (5), 14–27.
[5] Liao Jiali. (2021). Research on the Impact of Online Social Anxiety on Online Rumor Dissemination in Public Health Emergencies [Master’s thesis]. Zhejiang University of Media and Communications.
[6] Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615.
[7] Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349.
[8] Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the Extended Parallel Process Model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 206–219.
[9] Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39(4), 455–473.
[10] Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
[11] Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
[12] Southwell, B. G., Niederdeppe, J., Cappella, J. N., et al. (2019). Misinformation as a misunderstood challenge to public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(2), 282– 285.
[13] Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240, 112552.
[14] Dai Yajun, Hao Yanhua, Wu Qunhong, et al. (2018). Development and validation of a public risk perception scale for public health emergencies. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 34(2), 227-231.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
