Avoiding 21st-Century Eugenics: Gene Editing, Posthumanism, and Conscientious Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/cbq49187Keywords:
Gene Editing, CRISPR, Biotechnology, Ethics, Human Rights, PosthumanismAbstract
Emerging biotechnologies in the 21st century such as CRISPR gene editing have brought great potential for improving human health and treating fatal diseases. However, these technologies have also triggered profound ethical controversies and human rights challenges. By reviewing the 2018 He Jiankui incident and comparing it with earlier, less controversial experiments, this article analyzes the transformation of social concepts and the lag in ethical frameworks. The discussion extends to the broader posthumanist technological wave, emphasizing concerns about exacerbating inequality if genetic enhancements become routine, which echoes eugenics in history. This essay argues that technological progress should not come at the expense of human rights, and calls for a global pause in gene editing experiments, as well as the establishment of a global accountability system. The article finally emphasizes that humans must be guided by patience and responsibility on the road to the future, and while enjoying the benefits of science and technology, we must protect our common humanity and moral bottom lines.
References
Three Years.” BBC News, 30 Dec. 2019. Web. 28
April. 2025. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50944461. Blasimme, Alessandro. “Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation?” AMA Journal of
Ethics 21.12 (2019): E1065-1070. PubMed. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.1065. Braidotti, Rosi. “A Theoretical Framework for the Critical
Posthumanities.” Theory, Culture & Society 36.6 (2018): 31-61. SAGE Journals. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://doi. org/10.1177/0263276418771486. Davenport, Charles Benedict. Heredity in Relation to Eu-
genics. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911. Print. Future of Life Institute. “Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter.” Future of Life Institute, 22 Mar. 2023.
Web. 28 April. 2025. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/ pause-giant-ai-experiments. Genetic Literacy Project. “Global Gene Editing Regula-
tion Tracker.” Genetic Literacy Project, May 2024. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://crispr-gene-editing-regs-tracker.geneticliteracyproject.org. Harari, Yuval Noah. Homo Deus. New York: Harper, 2017. Print. Hedges, Chris. “Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism (W/ Yanis Varoufakis) | the Chris Hedges Report.” Scheer- Dean&Francis Tairan Ma
post.com, 29 Jan. 2025. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://scheerpost.com/2025/01/29/technofeudalism-what-killed-capitalism-w-yanis-varoufakis-the-chris-hedges-report. Lifton, Robert Jay. The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books, 1986. Print. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. “Oversight of Human Genome Editing and Overarching Principles for Governance.” Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance. Washington,
DC: National Academies Press, 2017. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK447266. Powell, Alvin. “CRISPR’s breakthrough implications.”
The Harvard Gazette, May 16. 2018. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2018/05/crispr-pioneer-jennifer-doudna-explains-gene-editing-technology-in-prather-lectures. Rainie, Lee, et al. “Americans Are Closely Divided Over Editing a Baby’s Genes to Reduce Serious Health Risk.”
Pew Research Center, 17 Mar. 2022. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/03/17/americans-are-closely-divided-over-editing-a-babys-genes-toreduce-serious-health-risk. Salib, Veronica. “Exploring 10 ethical considerations in genome editing.” Pharma Life Sciences. TechTarget, April 22. 2024. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://www.techtarget.com/ pharmalifesciences/feature/Exploring-10-ethical-considerations-in-genome-editing. Stoye, Emma. “Use of Crispr on Human Embryos Ap-
proved in UK.” Chemistry World, 2 Feb. 2016. Web. 28
April. 2025. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/useof-crispr-on-human-embryos-approved-in-uk/9411.article. UNESCO. Report of the IBC on updating its reflection on the Human Genome and Human Rights. UNESCO Digital
Library, 2015 Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://unesdoc.unesco. org/ark:/48223/pf0000233258. United Nations. “Universal Declaration of Human
Rights.” United Nations, n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https:// www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights. Varoufakis, Yanis. “Techno-Feudalism Is Taking Over”
Project Syndicate, 28 Jun. 2021. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/techno-feudalism-replacing-market-capitalism-by-yanis-varoufakis-2021-06. Walter, Stefanie. “The Backlash Against Globalization.”
Annual Review of Political Science 24 (2021): 253- 277. Annual Reviews. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405. Westermann, Lukas, Björn Neubauer, and Michael Köttgen. “Nobel Prize 2020 in Chemistry honors CRISPR: a tool for rewriting the code of life.” Pflugers Archiv: Eu-
ropean Journal of Physiology 473.1 (2021): 1-2. Spring-
er Nature. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00424-020-02497-9. Žižek, Slavoj. “AI and the Post-Human Future.” Project
Syndicate, April 7, 2023. Web. 28 Apr. 2025. https://www. project-syndicate.org/commentary/ai-post-human-futureby-slavoj-zizek-2023-04.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
