The Differences in Children’s Psychological Education between China and the West

Authors

  • Jialu Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/52y0kk25

Keywords:

Cross-Historical, Family Education, Chinese and Western Education, Psychological Education

Abstract

Psychological education is essential for developing a person’s personality and social resilience. The development of children’s emotional well-being is mostly influenced by education theories and methods used in various cultural contexts. From a cross-cultural comparison perspective, this report systematically examines the distinctions between Western and Chinese psychological education across three dimensions: family education, schoolbased practices, and broader social-cultural contexts. Findings reveal that collectivism, devotion, and academic achievement are the cornerstones of conventional Chinese education. Families and educational institutions commonly use control and expectations to control children’s habits and values. In comparison, Western education places a higher value on individualism, emotional expression, and self-actualization, arguing that psychological education is essential for developing separate personalities and intellectual well-being. This report examines structural differences in family education practices, college philosophies, and environmental-cultural values through research of various empirical studies from both cultures. These differences affect children’s social growth, selfesteem, and internal effectiveness, being considerable. In order to accomplish complete psychological development, the research concludes by recommending the creation of a child-centred academic model that balances self-discipline with personal care.

References

[1] Guo R, Li D, Zhao X. Children consider „who“ and „what“ when reasoning about rule changes: A comparative study of children from two cultures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2024, 48(6): 511-522.

[2] Lu H J, Zhu N, Chen B B, Chang L. Cultural values, parenting, and child adjustment in China. International Journal of Psychology, 2024, 59(4): 512-521.

[3] Wang S, Zheng L. Parenting style and the non-cognitive development of high school students: Evidence from rural China. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15: 1393445.

[4] Xu G, Fu C. Parental educational attainment on adolescent educational development: A multi-group analysis of Chinese left-behind and non-left-behind children. Behavioral Sciences, 2024, 14(10): 870.

[5] Zhao X. The consideration of cost in evaluations of moral praiseworthiness among Chinese children. Infant and Child Development, 2024, 33(3): e2461.

[6] Liu J, Huang Q, Park H J, Qin D B. Beyond collectivism and individualism: Chinese international students‘ perceptions of contemporary child-centered parenting. Family Relations, 2025.

[7] Wang Q, Suo T, Mei L, Guan L, Hou Y, Dai Y. Do future Dean&Francis Jialu Liu actions matter more than past deeds? Temporal moral attribution in US and Chinese school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 2024.

[8] Wu C C. The effects of Chinese parenting belief on preschoolers‘ temperament and secure attachment. Children, 2022, 10(1): 9.

[9] Cai J, Backer F D, Vandermeersche G, Lombaerts K. Comparing Chinese and Western classroom learning environment research: a bibliometric analysis and visualization. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14: 1213397.

[10] Han Y. A comparative analysis of Chinese and Western education models: Innovations and implications. ASP Transactions on Psychology and Education, 2025, 3(1): 1-3.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28