A New Approach of Wide Reflective Equilibrium-from the Perspective of Morality as Cooperation

Authors

  • Yanzhou Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/aw6bnd21

Keywords:

Justice as Fairness, wide reflective equilibrium, morality as cooperation, evolutionary Psychology

Abstract

This review discussed a possible combination of Justice as Fairness and Morality as Cooperation. The concept of Justice as Fairness, which was introduced by the renowned philosopher John Rawls, advocates for the use of wide reflective equilibrium as a tool to derive and establish the fundamental principles that should govern a just society. In this process, Rawls suggests that we should not only consider our own moral intuitions but also engage with the perspectives and reasoning of others, including various philosophical theories and arguments. The theory of Justice as Fairness, with its emphasis on wide reflective equilibrium, thus provides a structured yet flexible approach to moral and political philosophy. There are, however, sociological and epistemic difficulties in implementing its social blueprint, thereby giving evolutionary psychology and game theory chances to participate in formulating justice, as Oliver Curry had proposed in his theory of Morality as Cooperation. This review relates Curry’s moral molecule model and evolutionary game theory as substitutes for Rawls’ Fairness principles and original position in wide reflective equilibrium. It justifies their practical advantage, and by replacing the disadvantaged concepts with their counterparts, this review aims to produce a method with the characterization of being instinctively highly accepted with simpler methodologies; thus, this review looks to inspire future directions of moral psychology and philosophy.

References

[1] McPherson, Tristram. The methodological irrelevance of reflective equilibrium. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks, 2015, 652–674.

[2] De Maagt, Sem. “Reflective equilibrium and moral objectivity.” Inquiry, 2016m 60(5): 443–465.

[3] Harvard College, editor. A Theory of Justice. Harvard UP, 1999. Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149

[4] Knight. Reflective Equilibrium.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2023 Edition, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2023.

[5] Curry, O. S. Morality as Natural History: An adaptationist account of ethics. (PhD), London School of Economics, London. 2005.

[6] Curry, O. S. Morality as cooperation: A problem-centred approach. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of morality (pp. 27–51). Springer International Publishing AG. 2016.

[7] Curry, Oliver Scott, et al. Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies. Current Anthropology, 2019, 60(1): 47–69.

[8] Wenar, Leif. John Rawls. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2021 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) 2021.

[9] Rawls, J. The law of peoples. Critical inquiry, 1993, 20(1): 36-68.

[10] Daniels, Norman. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice.” The Philosophical Review, 1998, 107(3): 33-39.

[11] Haidt, J. & Kesebir, S. Handbook of Social Psychology. Chapter 22, Morality, 2010.

[12] Haidt, J. Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 2013, 42(3): 281–97.

[13] Curry. What’s Wrong with Moral Foundations Theory, and How to get Moral Psychology Right. Behavioral Scientist. Behavioral Scientist, 27, 2019.

[14] Graham, Jesse, et al. Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 101(2): 366–385.

[15] Kant’s Political Writings. The UP, 1970, 73-81.

[16] List, Christian, & Laura Valentini. The Methodology of Political Theory. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, 2016, 525–553.

[17] Greene, Joshua D., et al. An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 2001, 293(5537): 2105–2108.

[18] Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., & Henrich, J. The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 10918–10925.

[19] Pinker, S. The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 8993– 8999.

[20] Boyd, R., and P. J. Richerson. Culture and the Evolution of the Human social Instincts. Roots of Human Sociality, 2020, 453–77.

[21] Alfano, Mark, et al. Moral Universals: A Machine-reading Analysis of 256 Societies. Heliyon, 2024, 10(6): e25940.

[22] Curry, O. S., Alfano, M., Brandt, M. J., & Pelican, C. Moral molecules: Morality as a combinatorial system. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2022, 13(4): 1039-1058.

[23] Traulsen, A., & Glynatsi, N. E. The future of theoretical evolutionary game theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2021, 378(1876): 20210508.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31