A Systematic Review of Moral Disengagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/pzp6cr22Keywords:
Moral disengagement, social cognitive theory, cyberaggression, voice behaviorAbstract
This article delves into the intricacies of the moral disengagement mechanism and explores the profound effects it can have on individuals and society as a whole. To begin with, a detailed definition of the moral disengagement mechanism were provided in this article, aiming to offer readers a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of what precisely constitutes this phenomenon. Furthermore, the article investigates the far-reaching implications of moral disengagement, highlighting how it can lead to a range of negative outcomes, including the perpetuation of harmful practices, the erosion of social norms, and the potential for widespread ethical misconduct. By thoroughly examining the definition and impact of the moral disengagement mechanism, this paper aims to shed light on a critical issue that affects not only individual behavior but also the moral fabric of society at large. Besides, three experiments were analysed and the final conclusions were drawn. At the same time, this paper really puts forward the limitations and shortcomings of the research methods in the three experimental contents, and puts forward suggestions for future related research. This study helps researchers to better study the influencing factors of moral disengagement mechanism, and provides effective guidance for subsequent research related to moral disengagement mechanism.References
line gossip to cyberaggression should be conducted over Humanities Open, 2021, 4(1): 100171. a period of more than one year. Longer studies can help [2] Bussey, K. Development of moral disengagement. The
researchers get closer to real results. Oxford Handbook of moral development, 2020, 306-326. [3] Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Felps, W., & Lim, V. K. Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the 5. Conclusion interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality.
Based on the findings presented in the three aforemen- Journal of personality and social psychology, 2009, 97(1): 123– tioned experimental papers, the implications of the moral 141. disengagement mechanism encompass several key areas. [4] Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and Dean&Francis Wenqi Zhang action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook [11] Cheng, J., Sun, X., Lu, J., & He, Y. How ethical leadership of moral behavior and development, Vol. 1. Theory; Vol. 2. prompts employees’ voice behavior? The roles of employees’ Research; Vol. 3. Application (pp. 45–103). Lawrence Erlbaum affective commitment and moral disengagement. Frontiers in
Associates, Inc. 1991. Psychology, 2022, 12: 732463. [5] Bandura, Albert; Cervone, Daniel. Differential engagement of [12] Fehr, Ryan; Fulmer, Ashley; Keng‐Highberger, Fong T. self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational How do employees react to leaders’ unethical behavior? The role
behavior and human decision processes, 1986, 38.1: 92-113. of moral disengagement. Personnel Psychology, 2020, 73.1: 73- [6] Moore, Celia. Moral disengagement. Current opinion in 93.
psychology, 2015, 6: 199-204. [13] Zhao L, Lam L W, Zhu J N Y, et al. Doing it purposely? [7] Romera, E. M., Herrera-López, M., Casas, J. A., Ortega Ruiz, Mediation of moral disengagement in the relationship between R., & Del Rey, R. How much do adolescents cybergossip? Scale illegitimate tasks and counterproductive work behavior. Journal
development and validation in Spain and Colombia. Frontiers in of Business Ethics, 2022, 179(3): 733-747.
Psychology, 2018, 9: 126. [14] Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2018). Some problems with [8] Herrera-Lopez, Maricio, et al. Validation of the European cyberbullying research. Current opinion in psychology, 2018, cyberbullying intervention project questionnaire for Colombian 19: 139-143. Adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social [15] Méndez, I., Liccardi, G., & Ruiz-Esteban, C. Mechanisms
Networking, 2017, 20.2: 117-125. of moral disengagement used to justify school violence in [9] Falla, Daniel; Ortega-Ruiz, Rosario; ROMERA, Eva Sicilian primary school. European journal of investigation in
M. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the transition health, psychology and education, 2020, 10(3): 682-690. from cybergossip to cyberaggression: A longitudinal study. [16] Obermann M L. Moral disengagement in self‐reported and International journal of environmental research and public peer‐nominated school bullying[J]. Aggressive behavior, 2011,
health, 2021, 18.3: 1000. 37(2): 133-144. [10] Fulantelli, Giovanni, et al. Cyberbullying and cyberhate as [17] Gini G, Pozzoli T, Hymel S. Moral disengagement among two interlinked instances of cyber-aggression in adolescence: a children and youth: A meta‐analytic review of links to aggressive
systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 2022, 13: 909299. behavior[J]. Aggressive behavior, 2014, 40(1): 56-68.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
