The impacts of gender, educational level, and personality on the reaction to and use frequency of offensive words on social media by Chinese young adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/wk188w61Keywords:
offensive words, social media, Chinese young adults, gender difference, personality traitsAbstract
This study examined the relationship between gender, educational level, and personality traits and the reaction to and use frequency of offensive words by Chinese young adults. The target group was 16 to 25 years old and binary gender. The educational level divided into two levels with university graduation as the cut-off point. Personality traits were measured using selected components of the Big Five personality, openness, extroversion, and neuroticism. Offensive words are categorized into vulgar, pornographic, and hateful language. Statistical methods adopted multiple linear regression, and factorial ANOVA was further conducted to explore the influence of educational level and personality traits after controlling for gender. The results suggested that gender and openness were significant predictors for negative reactions to offensive words, while extroversion and neuroticism significantly influence reaction to or frequency of use within a single gender. This research could help moral educators, web censors, and censorship managers anticipate the reaction and frequency of young Chinese adults and provide more focused instruction and judgments.References
[1] Flores, A., & James, C. (2012). Morality and ethics behind the screen: Young people’s perspectives on digital life. New Media & Society, 15(6), 834–852. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444812462842
[2] Immordino-Yang, M. H., McColl, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2009). Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(19), 8021–8026. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810363106
[3] Corkum, M., & N. Will Shead. (2023). Online Moral Disengagement: An Examination of the Relationships Between Electronic Communication, Cognitive Empathy, and Antisocial Behavior on the Internet. Psychological Reports. https://doi. org/10.1177/00332941231216415
[4] Parlangeli, O., Marchigiani, E., Bracci, M., Duguid, A. M., Palmitesta, P., & Marti, P. (2019). Offensive acts and helping behavior on the internet: An analysis of the relationships between moral disengagement, empathy and use of social media in a sample of Italian students. Work, 63(3), 469–477. https:// doi.org/10.3233/wor-192935
[5] Armstrong-Carter, E., Garrett, S. L., Nick, E. A., Prinstein, M. J., & Telzer, E. H. (2022). Momentary links between adolescents’ social media use and social experiences and motivations: Individual differences by peer susceptibility. Developmental Psychology, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001503
[6] Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2008). The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2008.013
[7] Liu, J., Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2023). Analysis of Language Phenomena in Internet Slang: A Case Study of Internet Dirty Language. OAlib, 10(08), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/ oalib.1110484
[8] Qu, R. (2020). Research on the Diffusion of Network Buzzwords from the Perspective of Communication. Probe - Media and Communication Studies, 2(2), 40. https://doi. org/10.18686/mcs.v2i2.1304
[9] Stapleton, K. (2003). Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice*: WL. Women and Language, 26(2), 22-33. https:// www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/gender-swearingcommunity-practice/docview/198813729/se-2
[10] Ellemers, N., van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 332–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759
[11] DeFrank, M., & Kahlbaugh, P. (2018). Language Choice Matters: When Profanity Affects How People Are Judged. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x18758143
[12] Beukeboom, C. J., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2012). The Language of Extraversion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 191–201. https://doi. org/10.1177/0261927x12460844
[13] Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167202289008
[14] Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
[15] Mikkola, M. (2019). Does Pornography Silence Women? Pornography, 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780190640064.003.0003
[16] Kasai, M., Toda, Y., & Russell, S. (2023). SOGI Minority and School Life in Asian Contexts. Taylor & Francis.
[17] de Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex. Oxford University Press.
[18] Löffler, C. S., & Greitemeyer, T. (2021). Are women the more empathetic gender? The effects of gender role expectations. Current Psychology, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020- 01260-8
[19] Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1813–1831. https://doi. Dean&Francis Pengyu Chu,Siqi Yuan,Sichen Wu, Ziyun Zhao org/10.1177/1461444817707349
[20] Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2017). Theories of Personality (11th ed., pp. 231–238). Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.
[21] Zhu, Y. (2022). Open Chinese Internet Sarcasm Corpus Construction: An Approach. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2(1), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis. v2i1.2484
[22] Ye, W., & Zhao, L. (2023). “I know it’s sensitive”: Internet censorship, recoding, and the sensitive word culture in China. Discourse, Context & Media, 51, 100666. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100666
[23] Sharpe, J. P., & Desai, S. (2001). The Revised Neo Personality Inventory and the MMPI-2 Psychopathology Five in the prediction of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(4), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191- 8869(00)00155-0
[24] CAVALCANTI, J. G., & PIMENTEL, C. E. (2016). Personality and aggression: A contribution of the General Aggression Model. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 33(3), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752016000300008
[25] Barlett, C. P., & Anderson, C. A. (2012). Direct and indirect relations between the Big 5 personality traits and aggressive and violent behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(8), 870–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.029
[26] Evans, A. M., Meyers, M. C., De Calseyde, P. P. F. M. V., & Stavrova, O. (2021). Extroversion and Conscientiousness Predict Deteriorating Job Outcomes During the COVID-19 Transition to Enforced Remote Work. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(3), 194855062110390. https://doi. org/10.1177/19485506211039092
[27] Shen, J., Brdiczka, O., & Liu, J. (2015). A study of Facebook behavior: What does it tell about your Neuroticism and Extraversion? Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.067 Appendix A Table A1. Questions about educational level Question Choices Educational Level What is your highest level of education? A. Primary school graduation or below B. Junior high school graduation C. High school or secondary school graduation D. College graduation (associate degree) E. University graduation (bachelor’s degree) F. Master’s degree or above Table A2. Questions accessing openness, extroversion and neuroticism Construct / Sub-Construct Question Big five Personality traits Neuroticism I have frequent mood swings. I am relaxed most of the time. (R) I get upset easily. Openness I have a vivid imagination. I am not interested in abstract ideas. (R) I have difficulty understanding abstract ideas. Extroversion I don’t talk a lot. (R) I talk to a lot of different people at parties. I keep in the background. (R) Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149 Table A3. Question accessing the negative reaction to offensive words. Construct / Sub-Construct Question Negative reaction to offensive words Vulgar language How offensive do you feel when facing … on social media? “fuck with variants” “dick head with variants” “moron/retard with variants” vulgar language in general Pornographic language “prostitute” “cunt/slut” “ejaculation/masturbation” pornographic language in general Hateful language “fairy disease or otaku” “nigger or chino” “traitor or Jap sucker” hateful language in general Table A4. Question accessing the using frequency of offensive words. Construct / Sub-Construct Question Using frequency of offensive words Vulgar language How often do you use … on social media? “fuck with variants” “dick head with variants” “moron/retard with variants” vulgar language in general Pornographic language “prostitute” “cunt/slut” “ejaculation/masturbation” pornographic language in general Hateful language “fairy disease or otaku” “nigger or chino” “traitor or Jap sucker” hateful language in general Note: R = reversed coded items. Remark 1: The items from Table A2 use 5-point Likert scales ranging from “very inaccurate” to “very accurate”, with the instruction “To what extent do the following sentences accurately describe you?”. Table A3 and A4 also use 5-point Likert scales. Answers range from “not offensive at all” to “very offensive” and “never used” to “often used” respectively. Remark 2: For Table A2, the items are categorized for ease of understanding. On the contrary, the actual questionnaire has disorganized the order of the questions to increase validity. The five dimensions of the Big Five personality are included in each of the five questions. Remark 3: For Table A3 and A4, the items are categorized for ease of understanding. On the contrary, the actual questionnaire has the definitions of each types of offensive words before these clusters of questions begin. Remark 4: For the sake of flow when answering the questionnaire, the Chinese version was prepared while ensuring consistency of content. The actual questionnaire was displayed in both Chinese and English. For the Chinese version of the questionnaire, please contact the corresponding author.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
