The Influence of Teacher Teaching Styles on the Subjective Well-being of College Students

Authors

  • Minxin Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/87nshe86

Keywords:

Teacher’s teaching style, College student, Subjective well-being, Literature analysis method

Abstract

This study aims to explore the impact of teachers’ teaching styles on the subjective well-being of college students. Through systematic literature analysis, existing research results are summarized. Against the backdrop of deepening higher education reform, enhancing students’ subjective well-being has become one of the core goals of education policies and practices. Research shows that interactive and heuristic teaching styles, such as encouraging participation in discussions, providing feedback, and emotional support, can enhance students’ learning interest, engagement, and sense of belonging, thereby improving their well-being. On the contrary, traditional lecture style and reduce their sense of happiness due to the lack of interaction and personalized attention. This study further analyzed teachers’ teaching styles’ multiple effects and mechanisms on happiness. The results indicate that supportive and interactive teaching styles help enhance students’ autonomy, sense of achievement, and belonging, thereby significantly improving overall well-being. Although teaching methods with robust control can improve grades in the short term, they are not conducive to students’ long-term mental health and happiness. Based on these findings, it is recommended that teachers adopt more interactive and heuristic methods in practice to optimize the classroom environment and enhance students’ positive experiences and happiness. The research provides theoretical support for educators, emphasizing the importance of diverse teaching strategies. In the future, further attention should be paid to the impact of cultural background and individual differences among students on happiness to improve educational practices.

References

[1] Farhah, I., Saleh, A. Y., & Safitri, S. The role of studentteacher relationship to teacher subjective well-being as moderated by teaching experience. Journal of Education and Learning (edulearn), 2021, 15(2), 267-274.

[2] Berber Çelik, Ç., & Odaci, H. Subjective well-being in Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149 university students: What are the impacts of procrastination and attachment styles?. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 2022, 50(5), 768-781.

[3] Shamionov, R. M., Grigoryeva, M. V., Grinina, E. S., & Sozonnik, A. V. Characteristics of academic adaptation and subjective well-being in university students with chronic diseases. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 2020, 10(3), 816-831.

[4] Eryilmaz, A., & Basal, A. Student and Teacher Perspectives: Developing the Scale of Coping Strategies for Pessimism and Subjective Well-Being Model Based on Coping Strategies for COVID-19 and Goal Striving. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 2021, 8(1), 546-563.

[5] Flint, A., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Peterson, E. Teacher views of relationships between their teaching practices and beliefs, the school context, and student achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2024, 231-265.

[6] Hidalgo-Cabrillana, A. Teaching styles and achievement: Student and teacher perspectives. Economics of Education Review, 2018, 20-46.

[7] Wang Dingguo, Wang Qiang, Hu Chunhong, Xia Xiaoqin, Zhu Xiaodi, & Zhang Xiaoying. The improvement and lasting effects of single-session group psychological intervention based on the Satir model on college students’ subjective well-being. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 2024, (7).

[8] Chen Yun, & Liang Kun. A study on the correlation between sleep quality, physical activity, screen time, and subjective wellbeing among college students. Journal of Chaohu University, 2023, (6).

[9] Fang Min, & Sun Ying. An evaluation of the net effect of higher education on subjective well-being: A quasi-experimental study based on multiple group propensity score matching. University Education Science, 2022, (5), 72-84.

[10] Lin Lihua, Deng Huiming, & Huang Wenlan. A survey on the current state of college students’ well-being. Journal of Ningde Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, (1), 98-105.

[11] Han, F. The Relations between Teaching Strategies, Students’ Engagement in Learning, and Teachers’ Self-Concept. Sustainability, 2021, 13(9), 5020.

[12] Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. Do the benefits from autonomysupportive PE teacher training programs endure? A one-year follow-up investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2013, 14(5), 689-696.

[13] Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2014, 106(2), 258–267.

[14] Boekaerts, M. (. Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process. Learning and Instruction, 2016, 43, 76-83.

[15] Cao, C., Shang, L., & Meng, Q. Applying the job demandsresources model to exploring predictors of innovative teaching among university teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2020, 89, 103009.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31