Influence of Family on Adolescents’ Impulsive Digital Consumption Behavior: a Literature Review Based on Multidimensional Family Factors

Authors

  • Jaron Liu
  • Chengyu Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/aawwnm19

Keywords:

Impulsive digital consumption, family factors, unmet psychological needs, socialization

Abstract

Adolescents’ impulsive digital consumption behavior has become increasingly common under digital globalization, and yet its correlation with multiple family factors has not been well explored. The authors conduct a comprehensive review of previous researches on impulsive consumption and family factors and aim to profoundly explain the mechanisms behind the two’s relationship. The authors first summarize the primary research orientation and major focal topics in earlier relevant studies. Next, The authors synthesize a multi-dimensional theoretical framework from the literature, encompassing socialization, power, ecology, platform, and neurocognitive levels, structured from primary to secondary and internal to external influences. Based on the theoretical foundation, the authors explain the influence from different family factors on impulsive digital consumption through the hypothesis that family factors give rise to circumstances where different psychological needs are not satisfied, and the latter trigger impulsive digital consumption correspondingly. This study reaches the conclusion that family factors significantly influence performance of adolescents’ impulsive digital consumption behavior, and that unsatisfied psychological needs work as a mediating variable between the interaction.

References

[1] Chen, X., & Yao, L. (2018). Digital consumption behavior in adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 112–125.

[2] Kumar, A., et al. (2021). Impulsive buying in digital environments. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 34–50.

[3] Yang, Z., Kim, C., Laroche, M., & Lee, H. (2014). Parental style and consumer socialization among adolescents: A crosscultural investigation. Journal of Business Research, 67, 228–236.

[4] Bao, Y., Fern, E. F., & Sheng, S. (2007). Parental style and adolescent influence in family consumption decisions: An integrative approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(7), 672– 680.

[5] Moschis, G. P. (1985). The role of family communication in consumer socialization of children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 898–913.

[6] Batat, W., & Tanner, J. F. (2021). Unveiling (in)vulnerability in an adolescent’s consumption subculture: A framework to understand adolescents’ experienced (in)vulnerability and ethical implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(4), 713–730.

[7] Hota, M., & Bartsch, F. (2019). Consumer socialization in childhood and adolescence: Impact of psychological development and family structure. Journal of Business Research, 105, 11–20.

[8] Cunha, R. A. N., & Neto, P. J. S. (2015). The adolescent influence in family decision-making: Parents’ perception. International Business Research, 8(5), 244–256.

[9] Mishra, A., & Maity, M. (2021). Influence of parents, peers, and media on adolescents’ consumer knowledge, attitudes, and purchase behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 20(6), 1–15.

[10] Rani, P., & Catherine, S. (2023). Factors influencing impulse buying behavior: A review. Journal of Marketing Studies, 15(2), 45–60.

[11] Alqutub, K. (2023). Factors influencing impulse buying behavior among young male consumers in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 15(2), 36–50.

[12] Yu, M. P. (2019). External factors’ influence on impulsive buying behavior. Religación. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(15), 266–273.

[13] Lee, S., Gan, C., & Liew, T. W. (2023). Emotional status and impulsive buying: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103–115.

[14] Nielsen, P., et al. (2019). Linking parental mediation practices to adolescents’ problematic online behaviors. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 1–12.

[15] Lou, J., Wang, M., Xie, X., Wang, F., Zhou, X., Lu, J., & Zhu, H. (2024). The association between family sociodemographic factors, parental mediation and adolescents’ digital literacy: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 24, 2932.

[16] Gong, W., Rolls, E. T., Du, J., Feng, J., & Cheng, W. (2021). Brain structure is linked to the association between family environment and behavioral problems in children in the ABCD study. Nature Communications, 12, 3769.

[17] Wen, L., & Ju, J. (2023). The influence of family of origin on adolescent mental health. Advances in Psychology, 13(6), 2276–2282.

[18] Xie, P., et al. (2025). How personality traits influence impulsive buying through the sequential mediation of family dynamics and self control. Nature Scientific Reports, 15, 94564.

[19] Murnawati, E., & Khairani, S. (2018). The effect of store atmosphere and website design on impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 3(1), 1–10.

[20] Ward, S. (1974). Consumer socialization. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 1–14.

[21] Schaninger, C. M. (2012). Family decision-making: A review and framework for future research. Journal of Business Research, 65(6), 745–755.

[22] Flurry, L. A., & Burns, A. C. (2005). Children’s influence in family decision-making: Examining the impact of the changing Dean&Francis Jaron Liu and Chengyu Zhu American family. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 931–941.

[23] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

[24] Johnson, G. M., & Puplampu, K. P. (2008). A conceptual framework for understanding the effect of the Internet on child development. Developmental Review, 28(1), 11–31.

[25] Zheng, X., et al. (2024). Parental mediation and adolescent digital literacy: The mediating role of parent-child relationship. Computers & Education, 210, 104–115.

[26] Liu, J., et al. (2023). Active parental mediation and adolescent problematic Internet use: Mediating roles of parent– child relationship and adolescent concealment of online behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(5), 345–354.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28