International Education Development Strategies: A Comparative Perspective of US and Chinese Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/ckbz3738Keywords:
International Education, US-China Comparison, Higher Education, Educational Governance, GlobalizationAbstract
In recent years, the development of international education has gradually become the mainstream research topic in the global higher education field. Taking higher education in China and the United States as the research subject, this paper compares and analyzes international education from multiple perspectives, such as educational concept, system, and internationalization path. The research results show that international education in China displays the characteristics of “government strategy and society logic”: China continuously advances the development of international education from the perspectives of quality and international influence. The government issues policies to coordinate the development of international education, and universities promote international education through institutional construction. Different from China, the United States follows the logic of “market and institution” in the development of international education. The United States develops international education through rules, accreditation, and transparency under the guidance of the government and institutions. Although the governance method and development logic of international education development in China and the United States are significantly different, both face the challenges of policy uncertainty, resource imbalance, and lack of student support. Therefore, this paper suggests that both should learn from each other. China should learn from the experience of the United States in transparency and student support, while the United States should learn from China in top-level design and system coordination. Finally, through the process of learning and institutional innovation, China and the United States can achieve high-quality and sustainable development in international education.
References
[1] Wang Y, Yuan D. The new mission of international education in the process of Chinese-style modernization. World Education Information, 2023, 36(7): 5–11.
[2] Lo T Y J, Pan S. The internationalization of China‘s higher education: soft power with ‚Chinese characteristics.‘ Comparative Education, 2020, 57(2): 227–246.
[3] Zhang L. International education as „soft power currency.“ Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences Edition), 2023, 41(9): 122–137.
[4] Wu H. China‘s Outward-Oriented Higher Education Internationalization. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021.
[5] Xu Y. A contextual study on the localization of internationalization in higher education: International experiences and China‘s choices. Fudan Education Forum, 2025, 23(1): 101-109.
[6] US Department of Homeland Security. STEM OPT extension overview. Study in the States, [2025-09-30]. https:// studyinthestates.dhs.gov/stem-opt-hub/additional-resources/ stem-opt-extension-overview
[7] Bound J, Braga B, Khanna G, Turner S. The globalization of postsecondary education: The role of international students in the US higher education system. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2021, 35(1): 163-184.
[8] West M. Education and global competitiveness: Lessons for the United States from international evidence, 2012.
[9] Yin Q. Even as tensions grow, US-China joint venture universities have room to develop: New Perspectives on Asia. CSIS, [2023-09-06]. https://www.csis.org/blogs/newperspectives-asia/even-tensions-grow-us-china-joint-ventureuniversities-have-room
[10] NAFSA. Association of International Educators. NAFSA International Student Economic Value Tool, 2025. https:// www.nafsa.org/policy-and-advocacy/policy-resources/nafsainternational-student-economic-value-tool-v2
[11] Ministry of Commerce People‘s Republic of China. Head of the Department of Trade in Services of the Ministry of Commerce Gave a Briefing on the Development of Trade in Services from January to November 2023, 2024. english. mofcom.gov.cn/News/SpokesmansRemarks/art/2024/art_1bfed8 cb42bc4da8a29122a3c08d492c.html.
[12] Wang J, Lin J. Traditional Chinese views on education as perceived by international students in China: International student attitudes and understandings. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2019, 23(2): 195-216.
[13] Wen X. Learning to ‚tell China‘s story well‘: higher education policy and public diplomacy in Chinese international education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2023.
[14] Su Z, McDonnell D, Shi F, Liang B, Li X, Wen J, Yang L. Chinese international students in the United States: The interplay of students‘ acculturative stress, academic standing, and quality of life. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 625863.
[15] Kim S. Transnational resilience: exploring international students‘ agency in response to systemic racism in US higher education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2025, 38(6): 810-825.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
