Gender Differences in Cultural Context: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/06ynyz85Keywords:
Gender differences, culture, social norms, gender stereotypeAbstract
Gender studies’ core competencies include comprehending gender dynamics and how they might promote gender equity. The foundational gender norms that shape individual behaviors and societal expectations are critically examined and evaluated in the field of gender studies. These norms significantly influence on various aspects of our lives, such as the formulation of policies, the structure of educational systems, and the direction of activist movements. The field aims to uncover how these underlying principles perpetuate certain stereotypes and inequalities and subsequently inform and drive decision-making processes in both personal and societal contexts by scrutinizing them. This approach strengthens partnerships and provides long-term satisfaction. Effective communication requires respect for cultural differences and learning from each other’s strengths. Combining empathy with problem-solving skills fosters mutual respect, collaboration, and innovation, benefiting both individual interactions and group success. Gender and culture influence social behavior and relationship formation, with female culture emphasizing emotional support and male culture focusing on competition. Cultural contexts and gender roles vary across societies, affecting expectations. Future research could explore how globalization and changing cultures impact social interactions.References
[1] Son Hing, L. S., Sakr, N., Sorenson, J. B., Stamarski, C. S., Caniera, K., & Colaco, C.Gender inequities in the workplace: A holistic review of organizational processes and practices. Human Resource Management Review, 2023, 33(3): 1–25.
[2] Fielding-Miller, R., Hatcher, A. M., Wagman, J., Swendeman, D., & Upadhyay, U. D. Gender, justice and empowerment: creating the world we want to see. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2020, 22(sup1): 1–12.
[3] Brady, B., Rosenberg, S., Newman, C.E. et al. Gender is dynamic for all people. Discov Psychol, 2022, 41.
[4] Stewart, R., Wright, B., Smith, L., Roberts, S., & Russell, N. Gendered stereotypes and norms: A systematic review of interventions designed to shift attitudes and behaviour. Heliyon, 2021, 7(4): e06660.
[5] Florian Arendt, Media stereotypes, prejudice, and preference-based reinforcement: toward the dynamic of selfreinforcing effects by integrating audience selectivity, Journal of Communication, Volume, 2023, 73(5): 463–475.
[6] Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of health & illness, 2020, 42(2): 407–422.
[7] Lindqvist, A., Sendén, M. G., & Renström, E. A. What is gender, anyway: a review of the options for operationalising gender. Psychology & Sexuality, 2020, 12(4): 332–344. Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149
[8] Lantz-Deaton, C., Golubeva, What Is Culture?. In: Intercultural Competence for College and University Students. Springer, Cham. 2020.
[9] Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 2003, 10(1): 1–23.
[10] Chen, W. L., & Liao, W. T. Emotion Regulation in Close Relationships: The Role of Individual Differences and Situational Context. Frontiers in psychology, 2021, 12: 697901.
[11] Ruth Lewis, Elizabeth Sharp, Jennifer Remnant, Rhiannon Redpath. ‘Safe spaces’: experiences of feminist women-only space. 2015, 20(4): 105-118.
[12] Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 2000, 107(3): 411–429.
[13] Brands, R. A., & Rattan, A. Perceived centrality in social networks increases women’s expectations of confronting sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2020, 46(12): 1682– 1701.
[14] Li, L. Gilligan’s Theory of Moral Development. In: The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology. Springer, Singapore. 2024
[15] Skoe, E. E. A. Measuring care-based moral development: The Ethic of Care Interview.Behavioral Development Bulletin, 2014, 19(3): 95–104.
[16] Schuchter, P., & Heller, A. The Care Dialog: the “ethics of care” approach and its importance for clinical ethics consultation. Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2018, 21(1): 51–62.
[17] Chodorow, N, The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1978.
[18] Sprengnether, M. The Impact of Nancy Chodorow’s The Reproduction of Mothering and Its Implications for the Future. In: Bueskens, P. (eds) Nancy Chodorow and The Reproduction of Mothering. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2021
[19] Hearn, J., de Boise, S., Goedecke, K. Men and Masculinities: Structures, Practices, and Identities. In: Zurbriggen, E.L., Capdevila, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Power, Gender, and Psychology Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
[20] Benenson, J. F., et al. Sex differences in children’s formation of exclusionary alliances under scarce resource conditions. Animal Behaviour, 1997, 53(5): 1047–1055.
[21] Woltmann, S. Third Gender Politics: Hijra Identity Construction in India and Beyond. South Asian Review, 2019, 41(1): 3–15.
[22] Mal, S. The hijras of India: A marginal community with paradox sexual identity. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2018, 34: 79–85.
[23] Freud, S. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. International Psycho-Analytical Press. 1921
[24] Weiss, H. A brief history of the super-ego with an introduction to three papers. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2020, 101(4): 724–734.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
