An analysis of the reasons why moral intuition cannot be fully trusted in moral judgment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/850qwc08Keywords:
moral intuition, moral judgement, moral standardsAbstract
Moral intuition is an individual’s moral choice and evaluation based on subconscious moral standards when facing moral situations without relying on empirical evidence and logical reasoning. This article starts with the definition of moral intuition and analyzes whether moral intuition is reliable in the process of moral judgment. The article starts with moral judgment in the moral ambiguity zone and finds that moral judgments based on moral intuition are unreliable in moral dilemmas. Secondly, the article further analyzes the variability of moral standards and explains that moral judgments based on moral intuition may lead to retrospective moral conflicts and regrets after changes in moral standards. Finally, the article further points out that moral intuition is easily influenced by external pressure, which will further affect the effectiveness of moral intuition in moral situational judgment. In summary, the article concludes that pure moral intuition is not worthy of full trust, and a comprehensive judgment of rational analysis and moral intuition can better help us make judgments about moral situations.
References
[1] . Foot, Philippa. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.” The Doctrine of Double Effect, 2020, pp. 143-155.
[2] . Audi, Robert. “The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value.” Princeton University Press, 2004. Accessed 7 June 2024.
[3] . Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. Cambridge University Press, n.d. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ dictionary/.
[4] . Cecchini, Dario. “The reliability challenge to moral intuitions.” Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 3 Aug. 2023.
[5] . Myyry, Liisa. “Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict (Third Edition).” Science Direct, www.sciencedirect.com/topics/ social-sciences/moral-judgment.
[6] . McCabe, Gerard. “Imagining Community.” New Blackfriars, vol. 93, no. 1047, 2012, pp. 562–71. JSTOR, http://www.jstor. org/stable/43251659. Accessed 7 June 2024.
[7] . Barcalow, Emmett. Moral Philosophy: Theories and Issues. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2006.
[8] . Neuroprofiler. “Cognitive Bias: Utilitarian and Emotional Ethics: Neuroprofiler.” Neuroprofiler, 11 Apr. 2022, Dean&Francis neuroprofiler.com/en/cognitive-bias-utilitarian-and-emotionalethics/.
[9] . Elgat, Guy. “NIETZSCHE ON THE GENEALOGY OF UNIVERSAL MORAL JUSTICE.” History of Philosophy Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 2, 2016, pp. 155–71. JSTOR, http://www. jstor.org/stable/44076614. Accessed 27 June 2024.
[10] . Villines, Zawn. “Cognitive Dissonance: Definition, Effects, and Examples.” Medical and Health Information, 15 Jan. 2024, www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326738. Accessed 7 June 2024.
[11] . “The Milgram Experiment: How Far Will You Go to Obey an Order?” ThoughtCo, 25 Oct. 2018, www.thoughtco.com/ milgram-experiment-4176401. Accessed 7 June 2024.
[12] . Bakewell, Sarah. “ Would you kill the fat man and the trolley problem “ The New York Times - Breaking News, US News, World News and Videos, 24 Nov. 2013, www.nytimes. com/2013/11/24/books/review/would-you-kill-the-fat-man-andthe-trolley-problem.html. Accessed 7 June 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
