Strengths and weaknesses of the public and private sectors: taking education and food industries as examples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/rrxpgb26Keywords:
governments, private enterprises, education, food industriesAbstract
With society’s continuous development, people have more in-depth discussions on the areas that government departments should be responsible for. In order to establish an effective market mechanism, different sectors need to operate in different ways to promote the efficient use of resources. Taking the current situation of the education and food production industry as an example, this paper analyzes the education system operated by the government and the food production industry dominated by private enterprises. This paper holds that the public and private sectors have advantages and limitations, and adjusting the balance between the government and enterprises can prevent the disintegration of society. Only by strengthening the cooperation between the public and the private sector can the quality of human resources be improved, economic growth be stimulated, and resources be effectively utilized.
References
[1] . Andere, E. (2020). The Future of Schools and Teacher Education: How Far Ahead is Finland?. Oxford University Press.
[2] . Callon, M. (2021). Markets in the making: Rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. Princeton University Press.
[3] . Fannin, C. (2021). The Experiences, Perceptions, and Challenges of Chinese International Students Enrolled in an International Dual Degree Program at a Small Private University in the Southeastern United States (Doctoral dissertation, Brenau University).
[4] . Gardner, B. M. (2017). China’s Great Migration: How the Poor Built a Prosperous Nation. Independent Institute.
[5] . Hosono, A. (2022). Industrial Development and Transformation: Insights from Outstanding Cases. In SDGs, Transformation, and Quality Growth: Insights from International Cooperation (pp. 39–73). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
[6] . Ibidapo-Obe, O. (2022). Competition law and socioeconomic advancement: Nigeria as a case study–giving a hungry man a silk tie? (Doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University).
[7] . Jaunzeme, J. S. (2020). Fair value of non-rivalrous free communal good: concept, estimation, and applications. In Engineering for Rural Development. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Latvia) (No. 19). Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.
[8] . Kimura, A. H. (2011). Food education as food literacy: privatized and gendered food knowledge in contemporary Japan. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 465-482.
[9] . Losch, B. (2014). Family farming: at the core of the world’s agricultural history. In Family farming and the worlds to come (pp. 13–36). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
[10] . Madani, R. A. (2019). Analysis of educational quality, a goal of education for all policy. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 100-109.
[11] . Mngo, Z. Y., & Mngo, A. Y. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of inclusion in a pilot inclusive education program: Implications for instructional leadership. Education Research International, 2018(1), 3524879.
[12] . Otman, N. M. M. (2021). Quality in European Higher Education. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/ Egyptology, 18(4), 3665-3679.
[13] . Schouls, P. A. (2018). Reasoned freedom: John Locke and enlightenment. Cornell University Press.
[14] . Shapiro, C., & Willig, R. D. (2019). Economic rationales for the scope of privatization. In The political economy of public sector reform and privatization (pp. 55–87). Routledge.
[15] . Sleeter, C., & Carmona, J. F. (2017). Un-standardizing curriculum: Multicultural teaching in the standards-based classroom. Teachers College Press.
[16] . Verger, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2018). Test-based accountability and the rise of regulatory governance in education: A review of global drivers. Education governance and social theory: Interdisciplinary approaches to research, 139-158.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
