Legal Effect of Private Remedies for Wildlife Damages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/2gakh987Keywords:
Wildlife conservation law, Human-wildlife conflict, Private remedies, Wildlife damage, Legal effectAbstract
As China’s ecological protection has increased, the number of wildlife populations has increased, and human-animal conflicts in areas where the ecological niches of humans and wildlife overlap have intensified. Private remedies for wildlife damage are that the subject who suffers from wildlife damage or is threatened by wildlife damage and relies on private power to take measures to safeguard his or her rights and interests. The legal effect of the private remedy for wildlife damage is reflected in the local government’s obligation to compensate and prevent, the procuratorate’s obligation to supervise the government’s administration and initiate administrative public interest litigation, as well as the obligation to file lawsuits against the subject of private remedies, the court’s obligation to conduct a reasonable trial, and the criminal liability or civil liability of the subject of private remedies.
References
[1] Cai Hong. Civil Procedure Law [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2019
[2] Cao Mingde. Environmental and Resource Protection Law [M]. China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2008, 48.
[3] Chang Jiwen. Animal Conservation law [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press,2011:247 David M·Walker. Oxford Dictionary of Law [M]. Beijing: Guangming Daily Publishing House,1988:764
[4] Dawa Tsering. Hazards of human-wildlife conflicts in Qiangtang and preventive measures[J]. China Tibetology, 2010, No.93(04):71-78.
[5] Fang Sili. Research on the Legal Concept and Regulatory Role of Wild Animals in China[D]. Wuhan University,2021.
[6] Feng Jia, Bo Xiaobo. On the Public Interest Litigation Issues in the Revision of the Wildlife Conservation Law[J]. Environmental Protection,2020,48(6):26-30.
[7] Gao Yufang, Hu Junhan, Li Tianda. Wildlife conservation needs broader public participation[J]. China Environment, 2020, No.68(03):30-33.
[8] Jiang Zhigang. Ruminations on the Concept of “Wild Animals”[J]. Wild Animals,2003(04):2
[9] Li Lingyun. From damage control to risk prevention: the optimal way forward for public interest litigation i n w i l d l i f e p r o t e c t i o n [ J ] . C h i n a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Management,2020,12(05):130-137.
[10] Lv Zhongmei. From consequence control to risk prevention the important transformation of China’s environmental law[J]. China Ecological Civilisation,2019(1): 10-14.
[11] Ma Jianzhang and Jia Jingbo. Wildlife Management [M]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University Press, 2004:7
[12] Mi Mingjie, Lou Yushuai. Analysis of the legal nature of ecological environment restoration responsibility in the Civil Code[J]. Journal of Hunan Police College, 2022, 34(03):54-61.
[13] Peng Wanlin. Civil law [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1997:654.
[14] Qin Peng. Improving legal norms and governance capacity for wildlife protection[J]. National Governance,2020, No.271, No.272(Z2):56-59
[15] Shi Xueying. Environmental law [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press,2010:66.
[16] Su Kaiwen, Ren Jie, Huang Yuan, Yang Jie, Wen Yali. Status quo, challenges and suggestions for human-animal conflict management in nature reserves[J]. Journal of Wildlife, 2022,43(01):259-265.
[17] Sun Jiang, Wang Lijun, Li Junbo, eds. White Paper on the Legal Construction of Animal Protection in China [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press,2012
[18] Tang Shaojun, Wei Yu. On the Problems and Improvement Path of Wildlife Listing System[J]. Environmental Law Dean&Francis Review,2022(01):102-119.
[19] Wang Jing. Environmental Law [M]. Environmental Law [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2014:258
[20] Wu Jiayi, Yuan Naixiu, Shen Liquan et al. Wildlife damage and damage compensation in the northeastern region of Taihang Mountains[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2023, 43(07): 2605-2613.
[21] Xu Xin. On private remedies [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2005:94.
[22] Yang Lixin, Zhu Chengyi. The Negation of the Legal Personality of Animals--Annotation on the Legal “Property” of Animals[J]. Legal Research,2004(05):86-102.
[23] Zhang Lirong, Meng Rui, Jin Shichao, Pan Zhe, Zhou Jia, Dong Jinchi, Wang Xiahui, Wang Jinnan, Chang Jiwen. Implementing the strictest wildlife protection: China’s current situation and direction of reform[J]. China Environmental Management,2020,12(02):5-19.
[24] Zhang Ya, Dang Haili, Zhang Zhengwang. Enrichment of heavy metal elements in wintering small-billed and bald-nosed crows in Beijing[C]//Ornithological Division of the Zoological Society of China. Abstracts of the 12th National Symposium on Ornithology and the 10th Cross-Strait Symposium on Ornithology. [Publisher unknown],2013:1.
[25] Zhang Zuzeng, Lu Huaixi, Di Weijia. The legal review of wildlife protection list system[J]. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition),2022,15(03):273-281.
[26] Zhao Xiaona, Chen Qiong, Chen Ting. A study on the current situation of human-animal conflict and herders’ attitudes and perceptions in Sanjiangyuan National Park[J]. Arid Zone Resources and Environment, 2022,36(04):39-46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
