Reasons for the Formation of Young People’s Fertility Intention under the Three-Child Policy and Measures to Cope with It--Taking Ordos City as an Example

Authors

  • Yaxuan Dan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/4yac5317

Keywords:

three-child policy, fertility intention, semi-structured interview, life course theory

Abstract

In 2020, China’s total fertility rate fell below the international demographic threshold. In 2021, China’s average annual population growth rate fell to 0.53%. To cope with this situation, the three-child policy and its supporting policies were introduced in July 2021 in China. Taking Ordos City as an example, this paper utilizes semi-structured interviews to investigate the fertility intentions of Chinese youth and the reasons for their formation. The study finds that the overall low fertility intentions of young people are mainly influenced by their one-child families of origin, the rising costs of childcare due to elite education, the spread of feminist views on childbearing, and the suppression of childbearing by social media. In addition, most young people are unaware of the three-child policy and its supporting policies. In order to address this problem, this paper presents multiple policy recommendations, such as improving the financial guarantee mechanism for universal preschool education. While increasing the research on fertility intentions in western China, this study provides a reference for improving the three-child policy and its supporting policies aimed at unleashing China’s fertility potential and improve the low fertility level.

References

[1] Shen C, Wang L. Interactive development: The evolution and prospect of fertility policy and maternity security in the 70 years since the founding of the People‘s Republic of China. Social Security Studies, 2019, 6: 27-36.

[2] Choi SW, et al. Family policies and working women’s fertility intentions in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, 2018, 14(3): 251–27.

[3] Liu PC, Cao JJ, Nie WJ, Wang XJ, et al. The influence of internet usage frequency on women’s fertility intentions—The mediating effects of gender role attitudes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(9): 4784.

[4] Buhr P, Huinink J. Fertility analysis from a life course perspective. Advances in Life Course Research, 2014, 21: 1-9.

[5] Xinhua News Agency. Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Optimizing Fertility Policy and Promoting Long-term Balanced Population Development. 2021. 2024/08/15. Retrieved from:https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/20/ content_5626190.htm

[6] Wu F. Review on fertility intentions: Theories and empirical studies. Sociological Studies, 2020, 35(04): 218-246.

[7] Shukla A. et al. Gender roles perceptions and ideal number of children: Case study of Emirati youth. Reproductive Health, 2023, 20(1): 138.

[8] Chen MN. The discrepancy between ideal and actual parity in Hong Kong: Fertility desire, intention, and behavior. Popul Res Policy Rev., 2017, 36: 583–605.

[9] Bernardi L, Huinink J, Settersten RA. The life course cube: A tool for studying lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 2019, 41: 100258.

[10] Wang J, Wang GZ. The low fertility willingness research under China‘s Three-Child Policy and its policy implications. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2022, 37(02): 27-36.

[11] Mi RH, Yang X. Is it necessary to have fewer births in a highly educated society?——Explanation of education to the decline of fertility level. Journal of Yan‘an University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 42(06): 58-64.

[12] Yu X, Liang JN. Social norms and fertility intentions: Evidence from China. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13: 947134.

[13] Qiao PH, Li YM, Song YX, Tian X. Female university students’ fertility intentions and their psychosocial factors. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24: 685.

[14] Ning CL, Wu J, Ye YJ, Yang NM, Pei HC, Gao H. How media use influences the fertility intentions among Chinese women of reproductive age: A perspective of social trust. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022, 10: 882009.

[15] Chen H, Ling L. Research on the resource allocation of preschool education in urban and rural areas of China from 2021 to 2050 under the Three-child Policy. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(12): 113- 126.

[16] Zhao YJ, Zhao HY. An analysis of the input scale and source structure of preschool educational funds in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region——Base on panel data of 2010- 2015. Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities, 2018, 29(02): 108-117.

[17] Yang FW, Tuo HF. From maternity leave to parental leave: The path of innovation and legal continuation for maternity leave systems. Social Policy Research, 2024, 02: 67-134.

[18] Morgenroth T, Heilman ME. Should I stay or should I go? Implications of maternity leave choice for perceptions of working mothers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2017, 72: 53-56.

[19] Zhao YR. Childcare balancing policy in Japanese corporations and women’s fertility intention. Social Sciences, 2024, 13: 175.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29