A Study on the Causes and Effects of the Current State of Extracurricular Tutoring in the Context of the “Double Reduction” Policy--A Qualitative Research Based on Parents of Public Elementary School Students in Shanghai, China

Authors

  • Yahan Gu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/ep5hew45

Keywords:

the “Double Reduction” Policy, extracurricular tutoring, Ecological System Theory

Abstract

Based on the Ecological System Theory, this study uses semi-structured interviews to present the current situation of extracurricular tutoring that still exists in the context of the “Double Reduction” Policy and analyzes the reasons for it at the micro, meso and macro levels. The results of the interviews show that there are three types of tutoring for children under the “Double Reduction” Policy: maintaining pre-existing extracurricular tutoring arrangements, starting tutoring after the policy, and abstaining from tutoring throughout. In addition, most of the parents had a negative view of the “Double Reduction” Policy, while a few had a positive or neutral attitude. Based on the interviews, the study found that: Parents’ education philosophy, the school’s teaching mode, the “peer effect” of extracurricular tutoring, the educational streaming and examination systems, the anxieties surrounding social mobility among the middle class, and deeply entrenched Chinese traditional beliefs played a major role in the persistence of extracurricular tutoring. Subsequently, this study examines the impact of extracurricular tutoring from a social stratification lens, pointing out its potential to exacerbate the educational gap between different classes and families. Consequently, the study concludes with recommendations for policy enhancements aimed at fostering a more equitable educational ecosystem.

References

[1] Liu D, Xue HP. The segregated “Double Reduction”: The influence of “Double Reduction” Policy on student family‘s extracurricular tutoring :A qualitative study based on Ecological System Theory. Modern Distance Education Education, 2023, (04): 22-33.

[2] Chen ZZ, Li QS. Dilemma and solutions: Study on hidden extra-curricular tutoring phenomenon under the background of “the Double Reduction Policy”. Education and Teaching Research, 2024, 38(04): 77-93.

[3] Zhou BH, Lv SN. The current status, characteristics, and composition of reporting on new urban migrants: An analysis of „New Shanghainese“ coverage in Shanghai Newspapers (Part 1). Journalist, 2011, (04): 84-89.

[4] Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 2015, (3): 222-248.

[5] Ordoña TT. Six Theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1994, 151(3): 445–445.

[6] Junyan L, Mark B. Evolving micro-level processes of demand for private supplementary tutoring: patterns and implications at primary and lower secondary levels in China. Educational Studies, 2020, 46(2): 170-187.

[7] Song KO, Park HJ, Sang KA. A cross-national analysis of the student- and school-level factors affecting the demand for private tutoring. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 2013, (14): 125–139.

[8] Kim, TJ, et al. Do peers affect private tutoring engagement in Korea? Evidence from a quasi-experimental approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2022, 23(2): 1-13.

[9] Lucas SR, Byrne D. Effectively maintained inequality in education: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 2017, 61(1): 3-7.

[10] Kim S, Lee J. Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2010, 58(2): 259-296.

[11] Bray M, Zhan S, Lykins C, et al. Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education. Economics of Education Review, 2014, 3824-37.

[12] Glotzer R. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2005, 36(1): 152-153.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29