Exploring Implicit Biases Towards Disadvantaged Groups: An IAT Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/3b549h80Keywords:
Disadvantaged groups, IAT paradigm, Acceptance, Exclusion, Reaction time, Implicit bias, AttitudeAbstract
Disadvantaged groups, such as individuals with disabilities, orphans, and the impoverished, constitute a significant portion of the population across the globe. These groups encounter numerous challenges in their daily lives. A societal goal should be to support disadvantaged groups in keeping pace with social development and overcoming their hardships. Prejudice, exclusion, and discrimination persist, hindering the integration of these groups into mainstream society. This study seeks to examine public attitudes towards disadvantaged groups using the implicit association test (IAT), which measures implicit acceptance or exclusion based on reaction times. Compared to surveys or interviews, the IAT can more accurately reveal an individual’s unconscious biases and provide quantitative results. In this study, a set of ten positive attribute words, ten negative attribute words, ten conceptual words related to disadvantaged groups, and ten conceptual words related to non-disadvantaged groups were utilized. A total of twenty participants were recruited to attend the trial. The data analysis revealed a general tendency for implicit rejection of disadvantaged groups, with a D value of 0.92, which is very close to the maximum threshold of [-1, 1]. Moreover, the reaction time between the compatible group and incompatible group is significantly different. The results found no statistical difference in attitudes between females and males. The findings of this study highlight the implicit perceptions of disadvantaged groups and call for a societal shift away from exclusion, prejudice, and discrimination. It emphasizes the need for a more equitable, inclusive, and respectful approach towards these groups, advocating for a societal ethos that fosters understanding and support.
References
Banaji, M. R. , Nosek, B. A. , & Greenwald, A. G. . (2003). 3 understanding and using the implicit association test: iv. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.
Ding, Y.B., Wang, W.W., & Meng, Chong Zheng. (2015). Situational effects of high school graduate students’ implicit attitudes toward people with disabilities. China Special Education (6), 6.
Fang, Wenxuan. (2023). The effects of college students’ real pride and arrogant pride on empathy and implicit bias in the AIDS community-the role of perspective taking. (Doctoral dissertation, Wuhan Institute of Physical Education).
Gou, Z. (2007). Elementary school teachers’ implicit perceptions of students’ attention problems. Chinese Tissue Engineering Research and Clinical Rehabilitation, 11(30), 3.
He Huan. (2022). A study of pre-service teachers’ exoteric and implicit attitudes toward children with autism. (Doctoral dissertation, Northwest Normal University).
Kelly, A. , & Barnes-Holmes, D. . (2013). Implicit attitudes towards children with autism versus normally developing children as predictors of professional burnout and psychopathology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 17-28.
Rohmer, O. , & Louvet, E. . (2012). Implicit measures of the stereotype content associated with disability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(aop).
Tu Qiaomei. (2017). Measurement of College Students’ Explicit and Implicit Attitudes Toward People with Disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation, Shenyang Normal University).
United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Global
multidimensional poverty index (MPI) 2022: A decade of progress. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org/en/mpi
World Bank. (2021). Poverty and shared prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/ en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity-2020
Yang, Y., & Han, B. X.. (2017). A review of research on implicit attitudes toward people with disabilities in the general society Jane. China Special Education (7), 5.
Zhang, L., & Deng, H.-Y. (2010). Epiphenomenal and implicit effects of HIV stigma and its relationship with interpersonal acceptance. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology (6), 4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
