Analysis of Farmers’ Willingness to Land Transfer in Collective Land Construction Rental Housing Projects

Authors

  • Qi Chen
  • Xinyu Li
  • Zilin Sun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/twr84142

Keywords:

Collective Land, Rural Development, IAD Model

Abstract

The policy of using collective land to build rental housing was first implemented in 2017 in the context of the Chinese government’s proposal of “housing for living, not speculation”. However, due to the constraints of laws and regulations, the attitudes of local governments and social capital, and the attitudes of collective economic organizations, the progress of pilot projects varies from city to city. This paper selects the Nanjing Zhetang project and analyzes the factors affecting the willingness of rural households in the collective economic organizations to which the pilot project belongs to the land transfer through the framework of Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD). Finally, it is concluded that the strength of the collective economic organization of the pilot project, the traditional concept of land acquisition of farmers, and the concern of farmers about the unfair distribution of expected benefits jointly affect the attitude of farmers towards land transfer in the market. Finally, relevant suggestions are given to provide reference for other pilot projects in China.

References

[1] Tian Li, Tao Ran. Land reform, housing security and urbanrural transformation and development: Opportunities and challenges of collective land construction rental housing reform. City Planning Review, 2019, (09): 53-60.

[2] Ju Xiaoting. Reflections on the planning and construction of collective land rental housing in megacities from the perspective of land development rights. Shanghai Urban Management, 2023, (04): 76-83.

[3] Wang Yahua. Re-evaluation of the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework. Public Management Review, 2017, (01): 3-21.

[4] Lou Wenlong, Gao Xiaoping. Research on the generation mechanism of holistic governance in policy pilots: A case study of the reform pilot of collective land construction rental housing. Social Science Research, 2023, (06): 60-67.

[5] Tian Li, Wu Yaxin, Yan Yaqi. Development of collective land rental housing: Why policy supply fails: observations and reflections from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen. City Planning Review, 2021, (10): 89-109.

[6] Charles Krusekopf. Diversity in land-tenure arrangements under the household responsibility system in China.China Economic Review, 2002, (2): 297-312.

[7] Chen Hongxia. Income distribution of collective management construction land: Controversy, practice and breakthrough. Study & Exploration, 2017, (02): 70-75.

[8] Gao Xingmin, Gu Yuewen. The dilemma and breakthrough path of collective management construction land entering the market from the perspective of common prosperity. Rural Economy, 2023, (09): 11-19.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29