The ‘Wealth Myth’ of Beauty Influencers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/d694cw28Keywords:
Social media meritocracy, business strategies, Internet influencers, fans actionAbstract
Nowadays, more and more beauty influencers on the Internet can turn their online popularity into a significant financial advantage easily. The results analyzed important findings and information on the procedures utilized by effective forces to be reckoned with manipulative calculations, paid advertising, and brand organizations by using data analysis and questionnaires. After analysis, it has been discovered that these factors increase engagement and participation among those beauty influencers affected and create a feedback loop between those who have better resources and backgrounds. According to the findings of the study, success on social media platforms is not entirely dependent on individual success. Instead, the top influencers’ power and profitability are heavily influenced by money, strategic relationships, and algorithmic advantages. The study doubts the concept of equal opportunity in social media into question by finding discrepancies between beauty influencers with and without a lot of resources. The conclusion emphasized the importance of increased transparency about the external factors that determine the success of beauty influencers. By revealing the truth of top beauty influencers’ advancement, results show that the company can help consumers better understand the components of online entertainment and nurture a more computerized environment. The study advocates for a more level playing field for influencers of all types to succeed and contributes to a larger debate over the prevalence of social media meritocracy.
References
[1] Mijs J. J. Learning about inequality in unequal America: How heterogeneity in college shapes students’ beliefs about meritocracy and racial discrimination. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 2023, 85: 100814.
[2] Goto H. Belief in egalitarianism and meritocracy. Economics Letters, 2022, 221: 110896.
[3] Fainmesser I. P. Social networks and unraveling in labor markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 2013, 148(1): 64-103.
[4] Cao Y. Behind the rising meritocracy: Market, politics, and cultural change in urban China. Social Science Research, 2004, 33(3): 435-463.
[5] The meritocracy trap. Google Books. https://books. google.com/books/about/The_Meritocracy_Trap. html?id=nXXCwQEACAAJ
[6] The rise of the meritocracy. Google Books. https://books. google.com/books/about/The_Rise_of_the_Meritocracy. html?id=e_rTyIMJR9kC
[7] Ki C., Cuevas L. M., Chong S. M., Lim H. Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2020, 55: 102133.
[8] Belanche D., Casaló L.V., Flavián M., Ibáñez-Sánchez S. Building influencers’ credibility on Instagram: Effects on followers’ attitudes and behavioral responses toward the influencer. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2021, 61: 102585.
[9] Jin S.V., Muqaddam A., Ryu E. Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 2019, 37(5): 567-579.
[10] Masuda H., Han S. H., Lee J. Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 174: 121246.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
