The Research Advance in Ethical Issues of AI Application

Authors

  • Ziyi He

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/z70h3m63

Keywords:

AI, ethics, technology, literature review

Abstract

The topic of AI has become more and more discussed ever since the release of ChatGPT, as its astonishing intelligence has made humans to challenge the boundary. This vagueness then contributes to the emergence of discussions on the ethics of AI. Aiming to clarify the many current academic discussions on the ethics of artificial intelligence and to recognize different ethical perspectives, this study conducts a literature review of the research and discussions among different scholars on ethical issues in the application of artificial intelligence technologies. It is found that the current relevant discussion extends from a micro perspective emphasizing the individual to a macro perspective emphasizing the human race. Research advances on ethical issues in AI applications can be categorized into three levels: personal, social, and global. Among which, the individual level focuses on the ethical issues in algorithmic logic and user data management. The social level focuses on the social employment and public accountability systems. While the global level discusses intellectual property disputes and the social identity of AI robots. Finally, the author gave an evaluation of the gaps and challenges of studying AI ethics and emphasize the importance of addressing ethical issues in AI development and deployment. The paper aims to serve as information for scholars and policymakers, fostering ethical awareness in the AI research community and helping AI technologies to be developed and used responsibly.

References

[1] Kühler M. Exploring the phenomenon and ethical issues of AI paternalism in health apps. Bioethics, 2001.

[2] Bi Q, Goodman E, Kaminsky J, Lessler J. What is machine learning? A primer for the epidemiologist. american journal of epidemiology, 2019, 188(12): 2222-2239.

[3] De-Arteaga M, Romanov A, Wallach H, Chayes J, Borgs C, Chouldechova A, Kalai A. Bias in bios: a case study of semantic representation bias in a high-stakes setting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2019, 120-128.

[4] Peters U. Algorithmic political bias in artificial intelligence systems. Philosophy & Technology, 2022, 35(2).

[5] Rai A. Explainable AI: from black box to glass box. Journal Dean&Francis of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2019, 48(1): 137-141.

[6] Saura R, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Palacios-Marqués D. Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment. Government Information Quarterly, 2022, 39(4).

[7] Bordot F. Artificial Intelligence, Robots and unemployment: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 2022, 37(1): 117-138.

[8] Novelli C, Taddeo M, Floridi L. Accountability in artificial intelligence: what it is and how it works. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 39(4): 1871-1882.

[9] Rodrigues R. Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology, 2020, 4:100005.

[10] Ramli S, Ramli M, Mayana F, Ramadayanti E, Fauzi R. Artificial intelligence as object of intellectual property in Indonesian law. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2023, 26(2): 42-154.

[11] Jyh-An L, Reto H, Kung-Chung L. Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021: 50-72.

[12] Brown D. Property ownership and the legal personhood of artificial intelligence. Information & Communications Technology Law, 2020, 30(2): 208-234.

[13] Archer M S. Considering AI personhood. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2019: 28-47.

[14] Gordon J S. Artificial moral and legal personhood. AI & society, 2021, 36(2): 457-471.

[15] Ayyub R. I was the victim of a deepfake porn plot intended To Silence Me. HuffPost, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29