Ethical Reflections on the Application of Medical Robots in Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/fgr0b431Keywords:
Medical robots, AI, ethical issues, healthcareAbstract
With the development and utilization of medical robots, more and more members of the public have begun to pay attention to the risks of practicing medical robots and have expressed concerns about their application. In order to deeply study the ethical risks of medical robots applied in health care, this study chooses the literature research method to reflect on the moral and ethical issues involved in medical robots. The study found that current medical robots have many application scenarios, such as: surgery, rehabilitation care, assisted work and telemedicine. These application scenarios of medical robots may bring ethical risks such as attribution of medical responsibility, doctor-patient relationship, and data algorithms. Intensively, the study points out that inadequate laws, immature values, and technological deficiencies are the most significant factors leading to the aforementioned risks. Thus, adequate attention should be paid to the medical career, the intelligent technology of robots should be improved, and the relevant laws and regulations should be actively improved. This study realistically reflects the current situation and risks of medical robot application, and through in-depth reflection, provides inspiration for robots to better serve the medical cause.
References
[1] Jaishankar B, Praveen N, Senthil K, Chris K. Current and future medical professionals’ attitudes towards humanoid robots. In: Essam M. (eds) New ideas concerning science and technology. London: Book Publisher International, 2020.
[2] Broadbent E, Kuo H, Lee I, Rabindran J, Kerse N, Stafford R, MacDonald A. Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot. Telemedicine and E-Health, 2010, 16(5): 608-613.
[3] Beets B, Newman T, Howell E, Bao L, Yang S. Surveying public perceptions of artificial intelligence in health care in the United States: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2023, 25: e40337.
[4] Howe D, Matsuoka Y. Robotics for surgery. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 1999, 1(1): 211-240.
[5] Van der Loos, H.M., Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Guglielmelli E. Rehabilitation and health care robotics. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O. (eds) Springer Handbook of Robotics. Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 2016.
[6] Koceska N, Koceski S, Beomonte P, Trajkovik V, Garcia N. A telemedicine robot system for assisted and Independent Living. Sensors, 2019, 19(4): 834.
[7] Razek M. Criminal responsibility for errors committed by medical robots: Legal and ethical challenges. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 2024, 12(1): e2443.
[8] Dalton-Brown S. The ethics of medical AI and the physicianpatient relationship. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2020, 29(1): 115-121.
[9] Guo Yingwei, Yingjian Yang, Yang Liu, Qiang Li, Fengqiu Cao, Mengting Feng, Hanhui Wu, Wei Li, Yan Kang. Development status and multilevel classification strategy of medical robots. Electronics, 2021, 10(11): 1278.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
