A Study on the Current Situation of Gender Inequality among Chinese High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/59fszj98Keywords:
Seterotype, Gender roles, Textbooks, Erollment rateAbstract
Gender inequality is rife in both the society in which people live and on college campuses. The purpose of the article is to explore the factors which can be divided into three parts: family, textbooks & teachers. The way family members interact with one another, their educational orientation, the educational attainment of the parents, the gender stereotypes found in textbooks, and the prejudices held by teachers against women all may contribute to the existence and manifestation of inequalities between men and women in high school. The intention of this article is to lessen the incidence of gender disparity on campus by offering some recommendations regarding the causes of it. In addition to deliberately fostering a teaching and learning environment that is gender-equitable, teachers can assist their students in developing accurate gender perspectives. By sharing their stories of unfair treatment on social media, students, on the other hand, have the power to alter gender stereotypes and societal standards. Since secondary schools are students’ primary locations of education, they have the power to actively adopt curriculum reforms and update instructors’ perspectives on gender equality in the classroom. It is the responsibility of society to see to it that the government passes legislation safeguarding women’s rights, enforces mandatory education, and suitably balances the number of male and female educators.
References
[1] Merrett, F., & Wheldall, K. Teachers’ use of praise and reprimands to boys and girls. Educational Review, 1992. 44(1), 73-79.
[2] Caporrimo, R. Gender, Confidence, Math: Why Aren‘t the Girls“ Where. the Boys Are?“. 1990.
[3] Zeng, J., Pang, X., Zhang, L., Medina, A., & Rozelle, S. Gender. inequality in education in China: a meta‐regression analysis. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2014. 32(2), 474-491.
[4] Karen Hamrick. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2021. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, 2021.
[5] Postiglione, G. Schooling and Inequality in China. In Postiglione, G. (Ed.) Education and Social Change in China: Inequality in a Market Economy. Armonk, NY and London, English: M.E. Sharpe. 2006.
[6] UNDP. China Human Development Report 2005. New York: UNDP. 2005.
[7] Ylimaki, R. M. Curriculum leadership in a conservative era. Educational. Administration Quarterly, 2012. 48(2), 304-346.
[8] Croft, A., Schmader, T., Block, K., and Baron, A. S. The second shift reflected in the second generation: do parents’ gender roles at home predict children’s aspirations? Psychol. Sci. 2014. 25, 1418–1428.
[9] Fulcher, M., and Coyle, E. F. Breadwinner and caregiver: a cross-sectional analysis of children’s and emerging adults’ visions of their future family roles. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2011. 29, 330–346.
[10] Oliveira, Í. M., Porfeli, E. J., do Céu Taveira, M., and Lee, B. Children’s. career expectations and parents’ jobs: intergenerational (dis)continuities. Career Dev. Q. 2020. 68, 63–77.
[11] Polavieja, J. G., and Platt, L. Nurse or mechanic? The role of parental. socialization and children’s personality in the formation of sex-typed occupational aspirations. Soc. Forces. 2014. 93, 31–61.
[12] Eccles (Parsons), I, Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C.. Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman. 1983.
[13] Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. Gender differences in math ability: The. impact of media reports on parents. Educational Researcher, 1985.14, 20-25.
[14] Honig, Emily and Gail Hershatter. Personal Voices: Chinese Women in the 1980s. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1988.
[15] Wolf, Margery. Revolution Postponed: Women in Contemporary China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1985.
[16] Andors, Phyllis. The Unfinished liberation of Chinese women 1949-1980. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1990.
[17] Jacka, Tamara. Women’s work in rural China: Change and continuity in an era of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997.
[18] Yu Wei, & Hu Jiao. Gender Inequality in China‘s Compulsory Education. Journal of Northeast Normal University. 2005.
[19] Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. Universal characteristics of EFL/ ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 2002. 8(2), 1-9.
[20] McCaslin, M., & Daniel, T. H. Self-regulated learning and academic. achievement: A Vygotskian view. In Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 213-238). Routledge. 2013.
[21] Banet-Weiser, S. Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press. 2018.
[22] Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. # MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women‘s Studies, 2018. 25(2), 236-246.
[23] Department of education of Jiangsu Province, Notice on the pilot work of free. education for normal students, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
