Evaluation of Bystander Apathy in School Bullying and Its Psychological Impact
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/9vxw6x10Keywords:
school bullying, bystander apathy, diffusion of responsibilityAbstract
School bullying is a multifaceted social problem involving the roles of bullies, victims, and bystanders. The bystanders make up over 80% of the total members but seldom come to the aid of the victims. This paper investigates the phenomenon of bystander apathy in the context of school bullying, examining its causes and impacts, along with the psychological burdens on both bullies and victims. Based on the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility theories, the study uses a mixed-method analysis to explore modes of bystander involvement while discussing the role of empathy in intervention. The conclusion emphasizes that combating bystander apathy requires a school-wide network of support. The research indicates that bystander indifference increases bullying perpetrators' impunity and escalates victimization. Moreover, bystanders themselves face long-term psychological sequelae from passively witnessing harm. High-risk groups (e.g., socially anxious students) show distinct bystander behaviors across bullying types. Implications for intervention point to socialemotional learning and network-based peer support to break the cycle of apathy.
References
[1] Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.
[2] Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2009). Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 123(3), 1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2567 Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6149
[3] Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, Pt. 1), 377. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0025589
[4] Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
[5] Viaznikova, L. F., Osiyanova, O. M., Saltseva, S. V., Fabrikov, M. S., Belskaya, O. N., Streltsova, A. S., … Baklanova, T. I. (2019). Reasons of student social apathy. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.74172
[6] Bauman, S., Yoon, J., Iurino, C., & Hackett, L. (2020). Experiences of adolescent witnesses to peer victimization: The bystander effect. Journal of School Psychology, 80, 1–14. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.03.003
[7] Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-010213-115030
[8] Padgett, S., & Notar, C. E. (2013). Bystanders are the key to stopping bullying. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010201
[9] van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2020). The way bullying works: How new ties facilitate the mutual reinforcement of status and bullying in elementary schools. Social Networks, 60, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.socnet.2018.12.006
[10] XIE Jiashu, WEI Yumin, ZHU Zhuorong. Patterns of Bullying Victimization among Adolescents in China: Based on Latent Profile Analysis[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(1): 95-102. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki. issn1001-4918.2019.01.11
[11] Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Edstrom, L. V., & Snell, J. L. (2009). Observed reductions in school bullying, nonbullying aggression, and destructive bystander behavior: A longitudinal evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013839
[12] Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4–6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8624.2010.01529.x
[13] Rambaran, J. A., Dijkstra, J. K., Munniksma, A., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). The development of adolescents’ friendships and antipathies: A longitudinal multivariate network test of balance theory. Social Networks, 43, 112–122. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.05.002
[14] Coyle, S., Cipra, A., & Rueger, S. Y. (2021). Bullying types and roles in early adolescence: Latent classes of perpetrators and victims. Journal of School Psychology, 89, 51–71. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.09.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
