Factors influencing Chinese students’ higher education choices

Authors

  • Junzhe Gu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/a3b4sy82

Keywords:

higher education, international education, study abroad, qualitative analysis, education quality

Abstract

While Chinese students now have a variety of pathways to higher education, research on individual Chinese students continues to rely on statistical forms of questionnaires, making it challenging to understand international students individually and examine their choices through several detailed influences. Few studies have been carried out that are more detailed and specific to Chinese students. It is, therefore, worth exploring how students from different walks of life make their higher education choices and the factors that influence them in greater depth. This paper reports the results of a comparative study of five Chinese students with different higher education choices using semi-structured interviews. The author will control for the influences of each interviewee to conclude. The paper also explores the experiences and considerations of several Chinese students in their choice of higher education. The paper argue that Chinese students’ choices are significantly related to both family circumstances and personal ability, with family social class and the educational attainment of the student’s parents having a significant impact on Chinese students’ higher education choices. In addition, the individual student’s strengths of thought and ability also contribute to their own decisions in higher education.

References

[1] Guo, J., Huang, J. and Zhang, Y. (2019). ‘Education development in China: education return, quality, and equity, Sustainability, 11(3750), pp. 1-20. doi: 10.3390/su11133750.

[2] Morrison, W. (2019). ‘China’s economic rise: history, trends, challenges, and implications for the United States’, Congressional Research Service, pp. 1-38.

[3] Fox, P. and Mcintyre., (2019). ‘Clear advantages to study abroad: so why aren’t students enrolling?’, American Society for Engineering Education.

[4] Dillon, M., (2021). Concise reader in sociological theory.

[5] Muthanna, A. and Sang, G. (2016). ‘Undergraduate Chinese student’s perspectives on Gaokao examination: strengths, weakness, and implication’, International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(3), pp. 3-12. doi: 10.5861/ ijrse.2015.1224.

[6] Universities UK. (2021). International student recruitment data. Available at: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/universitiesuk-international/explore-uuki/international-student-recruitment/ international-student-recruitment-data (Accessed 10 July 2022).

[7] Sin, I., (2013). ‘Cultural capital and distinction: aspirations of the ‘other’ foreign student’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5-6), pp.848-867. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.81 6030.

[8] Cho, J. and Morris, M., (2015). ‘Cultural study and problemsolving gains: Effects of study abroad, openness, and choice’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), pp.944-966. doi:10.1002/job.2028.

[9] Tramonte, L. and Willms, J. (2009). ‘Cultural capital and its effects on education outcomes’, Economics of Education Review, 29(2010), pp. 200-213, doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.06.003.

[10] UCL Centre for Languages & International Education (2022a). About us. Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ languages-international-education/about-us (Accessed:17 May 2022).

[11] UCL Centre for Languages & International Education (2022b). Undergraduate Preparatory Certificates UCL’s International Foundation Year. Available at: https://www.ucl. ac.uk/languages-international-education/preparation-courses/ upc-foundation (Accessed:17 May 2022).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-06